Originally published at: REQUIEM FOR DARK MATTER?
It is perhaps a kind of synchronicity that on this anniversary of 9/11 that the title of today’s blog is taken from the email header that accompanied the following article shared by L.G.L.R. Needless to say, when I see an email header like that that challenges one of the core assumptions of modern cosmological physics…
5 Likes
These particle colliders in Switzerland or China or wherever they are, I wonder if people living near these projects, observe increased UFO activity or other strange phenomena.
How about people working inside, scientists experimenting on these particles, do they experience unexplained interruptions of their tests?
1 Like
Quantum effects are the effects of fractality of space. Fractal space is non differentiable but it can be made so by introduction of imaginary number i in the derivative and spinors instead of rotations.
That’s enough to create an additional potential energy term in the expression of the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian of your classical system.
That potential will act as a sort of “quantum pressure”.
But yes I agree that dark matter probably does not exist, neither dark energy. And like you said these are quantum effects. IMO due to the geometric structure of the ether.
1 Like
Suspicious? …Noooot !
3 Likes
Being illiterate in physics, I read a couple basic explanations of what dark matter is supposed to be. If I understand the bare-bones essence of it, mainstream physics couldn’t explain how galaxies hold themselves together since they weren’t finding enough matter, in the form of planets, stars, etc., to create the necessary gravity. So, since they assumed matter was the only thing that could create gravity or hold objects in place, they inferred that there must be invisible matter in the universe. (Somebody please correct me if this is way off.) If so, all I can think is, “Wow, that’s some wild reasoning! Have you proved your assumption? If you have, are other inferences possible?”
Unobservable, unmeasurable matter – made of of unobservable, unmeasurable particles that are assumed to exist – is one heck of a bizarre theory for science accept. To me, it’s as good as saying angels are holding the galaxies together and less good than saying ether is somehow keeping everything in place.
1 Like
The ether has a vacuum pressure it applies everywhere. Perhaps due to its peculiar shape.
Good questions… if they do they probably aren’t allowed to talk about it.
2 Likes
I have just started reading Paul A. LaViolette’s book, “Genesis of the Cosmos”!!
Order out of chaos seems to be part of what he is talking about & a continuous ‘creation’!! 
There was that story about the microscopic UFO’s that keeps fluttering the way of the protons, dampening the smashes.
Here is a paper on a study they did on this.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1067/2/022001/pdf
I have to say I was a little shocked that the physicists wanted to learn how to eliminate them so they can keep on smashing protons and cause more potential Mandela effects, rather than study why they are there and maybe take a step back and see if this might be hint that they’re not supposed to deal with these things.
1 Like
There are always public and secret labs in every such large installations. I work in a similar installation. Some places dont exist on any map of the place. We dont know where they are given how large the campus of labs is.
Thanks for that link, @Sphinx . Looks like somebody maybe even beyond our galaxy is trying to prevent us “heirless monkeys”, from potentially destroying distant galaxies, when we experiment with torsion and spin of few particles in colliders and causing effect far, far away, billions light years away.
Looks like particle colliders may be a weapon, modern versions of ancient pyramids.
2 Likes
Most definitely I agree with that.
And I think it’s scary this isn’t producing more afterthoughts, and that they rather work to eliminate them and just continue the work like nothing’s happened.
2 Likes