Roger Daltrey (from The Who) questions Big Pharma

… say it ani’t so Rog, say it ain’t so …

“Curiouser and curiouser!’ cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English); `now I’m opening out like the largest telescope that ever was!” … When Cenoscopy and Idioscopy meet …

Yes Alice, aren’t we all at this point?

Speaking with The Times about his time in charge of the Trust, Daltrey – whose sister died from breast cancer aged just 32 – expresses reservations about the scientific establishment’s approach to finding a cure for the disease.

“I don’t think they’ll ever find a cure for cancer,” says Daltrey. “I don’t think they want to find a cure. I’m being cynical here, but scientists look after the science but they also look after themselves. You do imagine if they did find a cure tomorrow it would be fabulous for the country, but there’d be an awful lot of scientists out of work. You might think I’m being cynical, but I do think that.”

Daltrey goes on to reiterate that so-called ‘Big Pharma’ has more to lose than it does to gain by finding a cure.

“It’s just human nature, isn’t it?", he says. "You’re not going to invent something that’s going to put you out of work.”

6 Likes

"Won’t get fooled again!! ".

1 Like

… Nice!

… since this has to have so many characters I will add these. (please ignore them) :slight_smile:

1 Like

Apropos the above-referenced " Cenoscopy and Idioscopy", an interesting essay:

1 Like

Yes, a very useful distinction. See Jeremy Bentham’s Chrestomathia … I haven’t looked in a while but this text used to be widely available gratis around the Web.