I think it has more to do with distracting us all from the online bill which has just been passed here in the UK.
… grifters come in all shapes, sizes, and -ologies. They wet their index finger and lift it to the skies. I wonder if this practice is upset by El Niño.
… see Will Farrell’s dead on John (I talk to dead people) Edward on Saturday Night Live (skit includes Mya Rudolph and Drew Barrymore). Classic lines are uttered as he is failing at his cold reading attempt: “Oh, now I’m seeing a mustache, Oh, Ok Yes, I’m seeing a mustache. Like a big Tom Selleck mustache, no, no that’s wrong … thinner like a John Water’s mustache.”
On occasion (in this case Russell Brand and before him Bidenenko, and Jimmy Swaggart, continue by inserting the name of your favorite grifter here) someone makes a correct guess from the wet index finger and rides it for a while … when the PTB become as Caesar, and find themselves no longer entertained, he/she/it is done away with. We need to remember all (and I don’t use the word “all” very often as it is dangerous to do so) of those presented to our gaze are actors (of the lifetime variety) and mimics by both practice and trade.
Feet of clay are much more common than we think.
This pi is really summing up the man,at least in my eyes, so I throw it on here as well:)
I remember he was “protesting” against high rents and living costs in London and had a question thrown at him he didn’t have an immediate response to and signaled to his “handler for the day” to come answer for him.
I think there was some commotion there cause he was dating the daughter of one of the owners of fashionable London housing at the time.
I might remember the details a little wrong, its 8-9 years ago I think, but I believe its about right.
Also precious: “Im not here to talk to you about my rent mate!”
This story was revolting then as it is now. At the time it felt organic but I suspect it was Tavistock or M15 as it did indeed shock and disgust large swathes of the public.
To split the hair once again … in addition to shapes, sizes and -ologies, there are the -isms. Government by Journalism, the edgy Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon, appeared in 1885 in the Pall Mall Gazette, the paper’s push-back editor, W.T. Stead. Pornographies followed. Stead himself was accused of using the weapons of pornography to right a wrong. His investigative approach was termed the death knell of responsible journalism. He was jailed for three months for “unlawful” methods of investigation.
That was despicable. I never liked the sight or sound of him, but after that I ignored him completely. Disgusting creep, shame others don’t see it.
Can’t help wondering if RKJr had much of a choice with regard to the interview with RB. Struck me as odd that he would have anything to do with him.
This raises yet another question: who will guard the guardians?
…The word “ideology” as being used here is as a shorthand for the manipulation (or at least attempted) manipulation (via interpretation) of signification, representation, reference and meaning.
The expression of “-ologies”(in that they are non-objective) are “presented” realities delivered via the " -isms" that are the specifically constructed means of delivery (the tools). I am not here thinking in terms of -ologies in the “ordinary” equivocation of -isms and -ologies.
I know, dear – it’s a 
jungle out there . . .
YouTube, a government and/or intelligence asset; developed for, and by, and financed by same.
So too with Uber, Amazon, Google and all those other platform monopolies.
So YouTube’s no longer concerned with artist’s content; but, laser focused on the artist’s ideology?
Russell definitely knows the enemy.
And, that’s another reason they want him to be damaged goods.
[Serendipity: reading “A Little Hatred” by Joe Abercrombie, 2019. The place I stopped reading a few minutes ago, page 270, “Perhaps that’s what makes a hero though. The towering self-confidence to dance at the brink of disaster and never consider the drop.”]
If one recalls Amazing Polly show on new new media, looks like this is a war between alphabet group of new tech/media and three letter agencies with emphasis on Navy intel as the one who run them, and new boys of PayPal mafia who are trying to carve their piece of pie.
AP made a connection to Peter Thiel, Rumble. Daily Wire and Musk. All of these outfits and more at certain point were going to get under the umbrella of X.com
So, when British gov, ordered YouTube and Rumble to demonetize and stop R. Brand shows all together guess who didn’t comply? Yes, you guessed…Rumble.
LOL, some people just never learn i guess…
As soon as the deepstate starts their character assasination all the emotional dweebs swallow the bait.
Idk if Brand has done anything sketchy, but I guess some people would rather beleive the msm instead of thinking he might be smeared becauce he is becoming a threat to their agenda…
Have to share this Ology:
Hmmm. Has the leopard changed his spots?
@Soupcommie
Exactly, this is one of the more balaced interviews about the subject I could find. The TV channels themselves create monsters and hide it from public years on end with no problem. Will those “creators” of those monsters ever be held responsible?
I am tired of that emo stuff guiding in what is real or not. Humanity is a hairs breath away from being a society where worldwide we push a button to decide someonce guilt and God knows what to do after! The world has become a Rome’s Coloseum!
The saddest part of all is our prodgeny isn’t helpt by all this polarisation, in effect quite the opposite.
I am sure this video will be shot down due to Shaun Attwood is not trustworthy and bla bla bla. Listening to one another before critiquing would be a novel idea!
Some people see “deepstate assets” and paedophiles EVERYWHERE, everyone except themselves, and whoever they follow who exactly mirrors their world-view.
Others I think as soon as something triggers their moral/ethical code ie. sex,drugs,rock’n’roll lifestyle, atheism/agnosticism/different religious or spiritual beliefs, making fun of sacred cow’s ie. Christianity etc they are automatically lumped into the aforementioned groups, as a way to relieve cognitive dissonance.
Yes. I do not defend Brand’s past conduct, if it is true (courts have not proven these allegations). But the woman in Parliament who wrote that Online Safety Bill is leading the charge - Dame Caroline (I never remember her last name - Dinanage?)
And her husband is a commander in the 77th Brigade, about which I am sure many Gizans already know.