Scamdemic segues into "personal carbon allowances"

#1

Well, that didn’t take long:

From the ZeroHedge article (bold and italics omitted):

An advocacy article in… Nature by four environmental “experts,” lays out one such very disturbing proposal—a means of restricting individual behavior known as “personal carbon allowances,” or PCAs, for short…

Individual allotments would be “deducted from the personal budget with every payment of transport fuel, home-heating fuels and electricity bills…”

“People in shortage would be able to purchase additional units in the personal carbon market from those with excess to sell,” the authors assure us.

What that really means is that the rich could avoid giving up their private planes since they could just buy up other people’s carbon allowances…

“Recent studies show how COVID-19 contact tracing apps were successfully implemented… in several East Asian countries such as China, Taiwan, and South Korea,” the authors applaud…

“[T]he many digital-tracing algorithms that were developed and tested provide initial valuable information for the design of future apps that—for example—estimate emissions on the basis of the tracking the user’s movement history…”

“AI could be especially beneficial for PCA designs that also include food-and-consumption-related emissions.”

In other words, if you eat that hamburger, we will know and deduct from your PCA accordingly!

Glancing through the Nature article itself, I stumbled upon this gem (bold added):

The aspiration of the international community for a ‘sustainable recovery’ from the COVID-19 pandemic… and the new behavioural and social norms formed during the pandemic, may favour PCAs.

Hmm… How convenient!

4 Likes
#2

NWO tried that “again” in late 2020 but folks was so occupied with fear mongering Covid1984 it barely got any notice. So yes, here we go again.

#3

Desperation does not become them.

#4

You should refer to the experience of the prototype markets of water credits as instructive of the intention of this system. There is even a carbon market (think of the trees and planned forests) already. The actual experience of this is the ability of larger players (governments, larger corporations, combined NGO action) to manipulate the market, create artificial scarcity and abundance over time.

I have had direct observation of this policy inaction. It has lead to regional demographic shifts and devastation of communities, and sold as “saving the environment”. I am thinking particularly of the experience of the Murray-Darling water credit trading scheme in northern Victoria and NSW (Australia, check again the Anglo experimental system in action- quick side note, anyone else notice that the combination of policies across the Anglo-sphere are now combined into a larger system?), where some 20 years of the application of this policy has completely wiped out the fruit, grain, beef and vegetable growing regions from that area and shifted them to other places, often outside of the country.

These schemes are nothing more than tools used by shadowy forces to implement social engineering on a grander scale than would otherwise be possible. Add to that the “austerity” measures and you have a machine that can directly effect privation and control as individual measures to coerce behaviour. Fits right into the “going direct” model, where your personal credits (which will be taxed both in and out of the market if you want to transfer them) can be specifically targetted, loaded with expiration timers and preferential purchasing “opportunities” and you have the toolbox to simulate a free market with all the hidden strings to directly intervene at an individual and population level the overt control of a managed marketplace.

40 years ago, my paternal Grandmother told me, as we tended her garden, “Gather seeds and save them. One day, you will not be able to buy seeds, if these people have their way. If you can feed yourself. you can survive.” She lost most of her siblings in WWII, uncles to WWI and ancestors to the invasions and genocide. History teaches us harsh lessons, but for some reason, no-one listens, people forget to remember, and we go through the same experiences over and over again. And we still sing “God save the Queen.”

It should have read “God save us from the Queen”.

3 Likes
#5

That pretty much sums it up.