The blame game projection is a stubborn problem!
So who is next? Are we going to see a memory-holing of anyone who stood their ground in the face of big tech censorship? I personally have had many of my tweets de-amplified to the point of ridiculousness despite my handful of followers on twatter. It is akin to the desperate efforts of a mad captain whipping his slave crew to heave-ho while the ship keels over.
The clear solution seems to be for everyone to abandon the ship twitter and then just build their own boats.
And yet these platforms are the digital equivalent of the strait of Hormuz and the 1% know it.
Don’t think the multitudes are reachable anymore. That bridge, for the most part, is closed. Maybe a brave loner will swim accros to the minority side. The multitudes are firmly entrenched in the blame game due to no other recourse if they want to stay in fantasyland and taking responsability means the meager few club constantly pointed at as nutters.
If you are lonely when you’re alone, you are in bad company.
That may be a good metaphor in terms of the Strait of Hormuz being a really busy nautical passage especially these days with the Suez Canal, but to sail all the way around the whole continent of Africa if this passage was blockaded or the canal was closed just to move containers from India to Rotterdam is a far more daunting task than writing a letter and buying a postage stamp if the internet is broken.
Arpanet was designed to withstand a nuclear assault, I think we can find a way to smuggle if we need to. Skull and bones my friends.
That was decommissioned in 1989!
Some things are baked in the cake!
ShadowNet – I’m not at all a Tweeter. What is the guy saying? That those who question and pushback on the lies are Anti-Semitic themselves and spout the Protocols of Zion in order to promulgate hatred? For me, at the meta-level, the Protocols are historical evidence of Anti-Semitic propaganda. That is not conspiracy theory, as I see it – it is, rather, conspiracy analysis. Help me get what your tweets intend? Alicia xo
I have these in file:
FBI Vault:
https://vault.fbi.gov/protocols-of-learned-elders-of-zion/protocols-of-learned-elders-of-zion-part-01-of-01
This, I assume, everyone can access:
From the Holocaust Encyclopedia:
I’ll leave it to others to decide the merits of the so called protocols, i have cursory knowledge of this rabbit hole however in this case I believe any decent journalism gaining traction with the public is being attacked with one of several vectors. One is antisemitism but you can swap in racism, transphobia, populism or whatever other device the propatainment media chooses to employ. Obviously Neil Oliver is about as antisemitic as a salt beef bagel but the mud sticks.
The newspaper article is cited in the tweet … the article cited the podcast …and then termed it hate-speech using the epithet du jour …
Lets put it this way, is JPF paraphrasing the protocols of Zion when he wrote Financial Vipers? I mean you can draw whatever parallels you like and call it a story but in the end its just an op-ed, or a hit piece if you want to be honest about it.
Of course we want to be honest! That’s why I am asking you. What exactly is “just an op-ed, or a hit piece?” The article itself, the tweet, the podcast, or the tweet about the tweet? From my understanding, you are saying that it is the article and the tweet which cites the podcast that are hit pieces – and your tweet is calling out the tweet as b.s. Right?
Absolutely I think the tweet is BS, sorry if this was not clear. Here is a quote from the linked article.
“The idea seemingly echoes a noted conspiracy theory document called Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, supposedly a secret manual for world government found by chance in 1986. This has a long section on the role of the Rothschild banking dynasty, a common antisemitic trope.”
Again, how can an opinion on what something sounds like it is conveying to the author be seen as a story?
Clear as crystal! Thank you, I’m a terrible tweeter.