I learned the ruling class members such as the Judge he went before to plead his case are convincingly cordial and nice while displaying their civility and liberalism towards the “unwashed”, yet defend the position of the “ruling”, not the constitutional case law precedents. His remark about her being the one to remove the gag order and would in essence be a sacrifice and position her as trader to her class. She obviously recognized this and was not about to put herself through such an ordeal. Instead she upheld the ruling while discounting the constitutional precedents of gag orders by kicking the case to the next level and judge…How can any member of the court provide a backbone to
law and order with mind sets and worldviews presented in this video?
