I found this one to be a good reference as to the essential ideas that gave rise to and underpin the EU theory. There is a lot I agree with in this approach to ‘science’ (as opposed to scientism!), but there are gaps too I think. Nothing in this model explains the ‘anomalies’ found on the moon, mars and other celestial objects for example, and Dr Farrell’s ‘Cosmic War’ ideas are equally valid as explanations for both documentary and observed evidence IMO. Nonetheless, there is a lot of appeal in the overarching approach that an electrical paradigm for understanding the Universe has a certain validity
1 Like