A couple of articles I came across, and I immediately thought of Hoagland and Bara’s book, Dark Mission. Maybe the corporations know something the interweb dosn’t!
Rolls-Royce secures funds to develop nuclear reactor for moon base | Rolls-Royce | The Guardian)%20and%20Nuclear%20AMRC.
My opinion (which most people can already guess) is that the definition of the moon might well be what we see in the “face” observed everywhere across the planet (curiously, thee same face in Australia as it was in upstate NY, 100 miles south of Montreal)… and that is a mirror image of the actual surface of the planet. IOW, we have vast land masses not seen, mostly beyond whaat we term the Antarctic Circle. THAT, to me, is the space these liars have been investigating and, frankly, is THE explanation for Buzz Aldrin in the population of Antarctic travelers often cited by Dr. Farrell.
I take no offense at disagreement with my opinion. It is just what it is.
I couldn’t get past this line …'where the company plans to bring back to Earth pharmaceutical products and other items manufactured on orbit '…
A boondoggle involving the moon. How clever.
Well hypothetically, if the Earth and the Moon are spheres, and the center of mass of the Moon is significantly off-center, the pull of gravity from the earth would maintain the heaviest side of the moon permanently facing the Earth.
The Moon is indeed a harsh mistress. “TANSTAAFL!”
So, the Moon is a Kewpie( voodoo) doll??
I am not ruling out the possibility that it is a hologram.
I don’t know that Dr. Farrell has ever validated the flat Earth theory, but I do know he has spoken about some interesting visitors to Antarctica. I mean, heads of State going to the most desolate point on the planet to look around is strange, but looking for land masses beyond an ice wall really dulls Occam’s razor.
I certainly did not mean to imply that Dr. Farrell in ANY WAY endorses the flat earth theory, but I am in agreement that the list of people who have traveled to Antarctica is quite unusual. I follow a theory, though, that suggests the movement of magnetic north in some way explains the “climate change” in that the circle of the sun is in a cycle (I think it is 26k years) that moves the “ice wall” consistently during this period which explains ancient ruins in areas we can not explain. The fact that the start up of NASA and the Antarctic Treaty signing all in the same year seems very suspicious to me.
But remember, I am “out there”- flat earther. Watch Vibes of Cosmos videos for a mind stretch.
