The Mystery Of Vladimir Putin's Mother Explained

#1

I really don’t give a flip about Putin’s mother, but want you to notice something else. About min. 00:18, it says that “Putin changed the Russian constitution…” This is the most important, single legal event that can happen in any country with a constitution.

The traitorous representatives in our U.S. govt are preparing for a constitutional convention, in order to change Our Constitution. If this happens, we might never see freedom for not only us, but our children, grand children & on down the line, without many, if not most of Our People dying to reclaim it.

1 Like
#2

The release date of this on YouTube two weeks ago is more than a little suspect. Did “he” actually change the constitution? In this context it sounds like he did it himself. Or, did he change it through the proper channels with the help of “friends”?
I’ve heard it said by Dr Farrell that it may have been written/drafted by Harvard University or another American university, hence the mention of USAID in the wiki link below. Were there other changes made at that time? I believe he’s over 70 now so to stay on until 2036 seems a bit of a stretch age wise. One never knows though.

From wickedpedia"

" Sergei Alexeyev, Sergey Shakhray, and sometimes Anatoly Sobchak are considered as the primary co-authors of the constitution. The text was inspired by Mikhail Speransky’s constitutional project and the current French constitution. The USAID-funded lawyers also contributed to the development of draft.

1 Like
#3

@bluenose

I have those same questions. I do not know what the legal process is for changing the Russian constitution but, I DO know what’s necessary to change The U.S. Constitution.

My point is that a country’s laws & constitution (if there is one) must be changed for a particular group or, person to take over a country The exception is a violent overthrow then, the laws are changed afterward. In the case of Germany, the laws were changed in order to allow Nazi takeover. I think the reaction of Martin Luther at the Wannsee Conference speaks volumes to this fact & the final solution.

1 Like
#4

Here in Canada everything one way or another is in “right of the crown” or some other form of legalese jibber jabber. That’s who gives us our “rights and freedoms”. Those who giveth can taketh away whenever they fancy. Other “Commonwealth” countries are similar I believe. The crown owns the commoners and the wealth.

1 Like
#5

CORRECTION: It was Wilhelm Stuckart who was atty at Wannsee. (I was thinking about the Bach post…)