Take another look at what’s being said about two experts on the vogueness of mass formation. Dr. Breggin is not too popular with his peer group.
CJ Hopkins recently did a piece on this topic, in his usual satirical style. From what I’ve seen, including the comments to Hopkins’s article, the debate over Desmet’s theory tends to get people’s emotions fired up.
I almost didn’t comment, since I don’t want to add to a debate that could become a major distraction from what I think is the main point: whatever happened, the public’s neurotic reaction was deliberately induced by the powers-that-be through a carefully planned, professionally executed, state-of-the-art mind-control campaign. That is, what happened wasn’t merely the result of a spontaneous psychological reaction resulting from a confluence of circumstances that came about by chance.
4 Likes
Agree. The debate over the name of an event does not invalidate the existence of the event.
What creeps me out is the ability to pull it off and hoodwink the world. I wonder what the cast party was like for the producers of this show. Looks like we are in the throes of the sequel and the theater doors are quickly closing behind us with the fire in the projection room soon to engulf the theatre.
1 Like
The cast party? I shudder to think… Maybe something out of Eyes Wide Shut or just a bunch of millionaires and billionaires drinking, taking selfies, and mocking the masses.
3 Likes
Considering who his peer group is, IMO, their disapproval supports Dr. Breggin’s take on this phenomena. One thing though, if it effects you, then it is directed at you on purpose and not just a general happening (i.e.: the big bang) like Desmet proposes.
2 Likes