That pretty much confirms what CAF theorized the gender identity education pre thru k would go, divorcing sex from reproduction. Also itâs going to open up the designer baby market thatâs creeping people out. I guess though if you canât make babies naturally, u got to get them somewhere.
At least someone is NOT woke in the UK!
From the article:
It was reported earlier this month that the NHS had changed the online landing pages for cervical, ovarian, and womb cancer to remove all references to women.
For example, the ovarian cancer health advice page stated: âAnyone with ovaries can get ovarian cancer.â Women, trans men, non-binary people, and intersex people with ovaries are all included.â
I have a tin of gourmĂ©t Portuguese sardines. Iâm not sure if the ovariea are included. Does this mean that I, or anyone in my household, can get oncitis( âcancerâ)?
I think CAF is on the right track. The elites donât give a hoot about gay, straight, trans, or whatever other kind of people. They simply want to eliminate natural human reproduction, except maybe among themselves. Remember Brave New World? From the Wikipedia entry for that book:
The novel opens in the World State city of London . . . where citizens are engineered through artificial wombs and childhood indoctrination programmes into predetermined classes (or castes) based on intelligence and labour. Lenina Crowne, a hatchery worker . . .
Thatâs the world I think theyâre aiming for: human reproduction done through artificial wombs in labs, or âhatcheries.â Whatever quota of human births they allow, of course. Theyâre hoping robots can replace most humans eventually.