Is this whay the definition of woman was “hard” to define?
Was this question of: “WOMAN” prelude to TRANSHUMANISM, being tracked for “our” FUTURES?
According too many footnoted sources; in future decades, “enhanced” individuals will represent a growing portion of the population. Not simply a small fraction; which will transform society, with the emergence of three strata of “beings”: 1) the ‘Tweaked’, 2) the ‘Freaked’, and 3) the ‘Geeked’.
[sources: DOD, Military, Intelligence, unclassified documents]
Gradually; the Humans, will fade into the 'Extinct" strata…
A sustained well-funded, and furtive campaign to transform the human being from a natural biological life form possessing unalienable rights, agency, and sovereignty; to a synthically modified ent1ty whose body & psyche are penetrated by the latest technological “enhancements”. Clever neologisms are thus, needed to represent the imagined ontologigical states new to human experience, to make these novel forms of existence acceptable in the eyes, ears, and hearts of the submissive masses.
Are “we” really being parsed into totally new social categories described in their Proteus papers?