That would be a real good way to get rid of him, poison his coke.
2 Likes
He most likely made a deal long time ago to get out alive i think.
Cause like you say these “dictators” usually end up dead before they can talk.
But I have a hunch that Lil Z will end up in a courtroom somewhere.
But it could still include him “dying” in public to send a message.
2 Likes
I think its safe to say most of them had “deals to get alive” at some point.
1 Like
This paper offers a contemporary and concise perspective on the topic, making it an excellent choice for those short on time. Argentina was nearly the location selected for “The State of Israel” as opposed to the “Houses of Israel” and the identity thieving Eastern European/Central Asiatic gangster Babylonians claiming the lineage of Nimrod.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288407452_Zionist-Nazi_Collaboration
3 Likes
Those “deaths” in public are very interesting. Do you have any intelligence on Epstein?
I used to think that he was really that, but, thanks to continual questioning od the narrative, i could understand that the MeMe: “Epstein didn´t kill himself”, really meant that he is ALIVE, not that he was mudered.
This made no sense in a first moment, but studying the history of this world, and the patterns of the same continuous central core of individuals trough history, that always control all sides in all conflicts, i can see clearly that this fits perfectly in the greater possibilities. But i need some real intelligence to find any evidence that this is the true truth.
Perhaps you made a prophecy on that call for him “dying in public”?
2 Likes
This hot information, to better understand the details of history that i learned from this book:
Read it as fast as you can, perhaps this is the single greatest journalistic document of the 20th century. It alone will cause a revolution if it reach a critical mass of readers.
1 Like
@g3orgeslu1zsegund0
Do you realize that you just told someone on another thread it was good that they didn’t depend upon a book and now, you present a book on this thread? “Hot information…details of history…single greatest journalistic document of the 20th century”. GET REAL! LOL!
If you aplly logic, you will see that i said that a person can´t depend on a book to know what is truth about god, not about history.
Go there, and read it again, to better understand the context, and think about what you said.
1 Like
Maybe you should write a book yourself. Geez…
Bye!
Intellectual Honesty is only for the wise.
Whatever (+20 whatevers)
If only those wise have intellectual honesty then no one else can be intellectually honest?
I think there is a flaw in the logic.
1 Like
The logic is perfect, there is no flaw whatsoever.
Wisdom is a choice that can be made about even the minor actions in daily life, intelectual honesty is a wise choice that can be made in every oportunity to engage in intellectual activity.
But to chose a single time doesn´t imply that the person will choose always. There are some individuals that will have selective wisdom, using it sometimes, not using in others.
It´´s like good manners, or good will, sometimes we have it, some times we lose it.
Only the wise can be intellectualy honest, because it requires huge wisdom to know what is the meaning of it, and the time, and the form, and the value, of choosing it. But being wise in choosing it one time doesnt imply that the individual is bound to choose it always. Wise is a verb, not an adjective.
One example of great, consistent intellectual honesty is Professor Joseph Farrel. He is one of the greatest alive to be sincere. Another is Douglas Reed, but he is dead. Another is Paula Schimmit, the Journalist.
I disagree, being intellectually honest has nothing to do with wisdom. It could be an attribute but not a requirement.
5 Likes
What is your argument for it having nothing to do with wisdom?
I never saw a fool that was intellectually honest, it will be interesting to see the consistency of your logic to sustain such a view.
What is wise? What is intellectual honesty?
They are words we hear and see. We assign meaning to words based on our brain’s interpretation of our prior experience and perception of these symbols.
I may have the experience of sticking a fork in an electrical outlet and get shocked, but tell no one.
Then I encounter someone about to do the same thing and warn them.
They don’t listen and get shocked. Would that person consider me intellectually honest and/or wise or neither if they weren’t aware of the meaning of those words?
After all words are just symbols that we assign meaning.
1 Like
To be wise, is to be able to know what choice takes into account the well being of all living beings, and having the strenght and courage to make it.
To be intelectually honesty is to be honest in the tought process in itself, not just in actions, but in the shape, form, and structure of tought process, from start to end, without fail, in order to speak and do only the truth with other human beings. To recognize the both sides of any proposition are equivalent, and that truth has no sides, if something has a side, it isn´t true, neither the truth.
Thes are words we hear and see, for those who hear and see. These are words that i live in the small choices of daily life. This is way that intellectual honesty is only for the wise. Wisdom is a choice that need to be made second after second, choice after choice. Like you yourself is saying, you don´t make this kind of choice with consistency, neither they are a life style for you or an ideal. They are mere concepts, void of direct practical experience, something that is the direct oposite of my reality, where i try to live day by day it with military discipline.
About that question:
“I may have the experience of sticking a fork in an electrical outlet and get shocked, but tell no one.
Then I encounter someone about to do the same thing and warn them.
They don’t listen and get shocked. Would that person consider me intellectually honest and/or wise or neither if they weren’t aware of the meaning of those words?”
This is a tough question, because i know the meaning of these words since 4 years old, when i learned to read and started interpreting texts and data. I was born with them as clear as the light of the sun. I don´t know how it is to doesn´t be aware of those meanings, i knew what was wisdom and intelectual honesty since the first day when starting to learn how to read, it was like walking, or breathing.
It´s impossible for me to honestly answer in your question, in the same sense that it would be impossible for a someone who was born with eyes that function normally to understand the reality of someone who was born blind, and explain to it what it sees. He didnt go trough the process of learning to see, he just saw, so it´s impossible even to imagine how is the mind and the life of the one without that sense functioning.
When i first made contact with the concept of Wisdom, at age 5, i already knew what it meant, and with intelectual honesty, at 35, i already knew it for 30 years. The realities that the concepts describred where my daily life.Nnot so much the wisdom, it´hard to be consistently wise, but very strongly the intelectual honesty, because it´s easy to be honest in tought process.
Yours is a very interesting question brother, but you have to make it to someone who only understand those things as pure concepts, void of pratical day to day experience, to have an honest answer.
It all boils down to how good of a crap detector one possesses….
1 Like
“Discernment is not knowing right from wrong; it is knowing right from almost right.”
–Charles Spurgeon
5 Likes
It´s far more sophisticated than that, but for you, it´s the maximum that can be understood.