Sounds very similar to proposed legislation in Canada. No surprise there. Sauce for the British goose is sauce for the Commonwealth gander(s).
https://openparliament.ca/bills/44-1/C-27/?page=2
Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON
“Mr. Speaker, it is absolutely essential. If we lose privacy as a fundamental right, or even, as in this bill, we put it in Parliament’s business, and when we get to the courts and people who have had their rights trampled on, who have had their homes addresses on the Internet for everyone to see because they donated to something, we lose what we value as individuals, as Canadians and as a Canadian society. We lose the protection for all of us to have the right to live a great life, volunteer, do the things we want to do, pursue that which motivates us the most, not because man or God says it is the right thing to do but because it is our natural right as Canadians. It is what we tout to the world as our freedom. Protecting that is paramount.
We have laws to protect that and give us the ability to look after that, but we do not mention that in any part of the bill. The bill is missing that. The biggest problem with the bill is that, if it becomes law and this is still not in the bill, then the courts and businesses are left to their own definitions of what that means. I talked about legitimate interest. It has to be in this bill from the outset. It is in the European Union’s bill, and it is in Quebec’s privacy bill, so why is it not in the Canadian bill being presented to Parliament?”
Status of current Canadian bill C-27. Several steps to be taken before it passes and is ‘proclaimed’.
Pretty well confirms our suspicions about him. He is starting to look like Rasputin.
I don’t believe MI6’s propaganda surrounding Grigori Rasputin, especially the account of his murder, which does not match the autopsy findings.