The research presented in article aligns with my belief that the CO2 component of the “climate change narrative” is and has been a boldfaced lie.
That said, I once again have to assert that another author missed the point; this time with the very title of the article! Tyler Durden made what I see is a proper conclusion from the data which is CO2 that levels pose no threat to the environment:
Conclusion
Taken together, these three bits of data should make anyone doubt that further increases in CO2 pose any kind of environmental threat. The earth may be warming, but it is unlikely that CO2 is responsible. There is almost no chance that these changes are life threatening or even – granted that human activity is probably not responsible – that warming will continue indefinitely. It’s time to cease panicking. Let’s zero Net Zero.
But for some reason, he equates refutation of CO2 narrative with refutation of the climate crisis, as if the latter is caused only by the former. This one simple mistake (in my opinion) of mistitling the article castrated it.
I believe there IS an existential climate crisis the primary cause of which is geoengineering. It has been going on in earnest since 1998 and evidence can be seen daily by looking at the sky and satellite imagery (image below is an hour old).
Durden published a great article, but a more appropriate title would have been “Three Graphs Show CO2 Poses No Environmental Threat”.