Originally published at: TIDBIT: ENTANGLEMENT, CONSCIOUSNESS, AND ACOUSTICS
While you’re contemplating the mind-boggling set of high octane speculations spinning out from today’s main blog, ponder these two stories, shared by T.M. and K.M. Note that in the first article, consciousness is increasingly understood to be possibly linked to entanglement, and that would ultimately suggest it is fundamentally non-local in character; and note that…
4 Likes
The question[s] are just about infinite when it comes to “consciouness”
They’re the dimensions, of the inherent question[s] [en]invloved. AND, yes “envolved” is not a word. Which symbolizes another inherent problem: Language itself. Thirdle[and, very aprpos];
they’re assuminhg there aren’t “3” three particles.
Just because you can’t see; measure; or experimentally show a 3rd, doesn’t mean its not there.
In other words, do “we” have the necessary tools to phathum out consciosness?
Or, a better adjective “ferret” out consciouness?
Obviously non-locality is everywhere.
Ironically, in trying to control conscious “they” are “everyware”.
Language is part and parcel to the “living” universe.
Plus, the interpretation of the experiments and concluding stats are quite frakly…
Prejudice.
Very clever, and I had no idea how far “they’ve” advanced.
Problem is “they’re” so-called goals.
Which are goulish goals; BCI[Brain Communication Interfaces.
An Orwellian goal of breaching that last bastion of free will.
The greys celss inside your skull, AND its escape into non-locality.
And/or, by means on non-locality.
Fee Fi Fo Fum
“They” love the smell of Planet Lab Rats
Throughout the Galaxies
Be Man living
AND/or be he dead
Evil will seek out…
His consciousness
To imprison him
As is; the Devil
I sprayed a fire ant mound this morning…probably caused a car wreck in China or something. It’s an entangled web we weave, even when we don’t seek to deceive. 
2 Likes