There are the public plans, over which there can be polarising arguments helpfully diverting the public’s attention… and then there are the real plans which are, at best, only partially perceived by frighteningly few outside of the real decision makers.
More and more I’m ignoring the bread and circuses and simply listening to the people around me. When I get to hear their actual opinions on almost anything, I’m staggered by the frequently child-like simplicity of their arguments, but a simplicity that absolutely mimics the positions fed them by their closed information oracles.
I now only listen. Offering opinions can be very dangerous. And I’m sure this is going to get much, much worse … which is also, no doubt, a hint as to the intentions of the hidden planners.
“You voted them in, just vote them out”
Euh… Do you see democracy voting anywhere? The european union apoints their dictators, the population has no say whatsoever!
The PARTY always comes first.
Because without The PARTY,
there is no state.
Referencing your title, “…17% on target and failing so why are they trying to accelerate to 2030…”
I’ve always suspected that something out of their control is about to happen near the 2030 date and they’ve got to get as much of the population under their thumbs as possible. I don’t know what it is, but I can start with Valentina Zharkova’s Grand Solar Minimum; the height of which BEGINS in 2030 and lasts to 2053-2055. We’re already seeing the precursors. What we haven’t seen yet is the massive volcanic eruptions and earthquakes that preceded the heights of other GSM’s on record. The kind of volcanic activity that literally blocked much of the solar rays. IDK what the concrete answer is, but they’re acting in a panic, as if like they don’t do everything possible, whether it works or not, they might not survive it. Whatever it is, it’s out of their control.
… I wish the world were like that … but it just isn’t.
Yeah, one of the myriad of simplistic answers that blurt from ignorant mouths.
@beaver i do lean towards something like this being known to those who have the technology and means to know. Weirdly Zuckerberg just bought a faux-castle in Waterford Ireland (Mark Zuckerberg Added a $35M Irish Castle to His Real Estate Portfolio), not far from the sea. Could be a ruse or a feint since he has built a dumb in Hawaii too I believe amongst no doubt other spots. Nevertheless, something of that order either natural or otherwise is incoming and accelerating. The global seismic and volcanic weirdness indicates this methinks.
Agree. There are planetary changes occurring of which only the elite know the exact cause. My best friend of 55 years lives on Kauai and Zuckerberg has bought up a sizeable chunk of land on the island; much to the consternation of long time residents. She says they have platforms loading cargo ships just offshore. Hmm. A trial run? IDK.
Not sure that burying oneself will be any better than living topside. The reason I say this is my friend leased a room to one of the men who helped build out the elevator and shaft there and although it’s deeply imbedded in rock, a strong enough quake could dislodge it by a small bit and make it unusable. Even more important and I have enough experience at sea to say, “Water finds a way”. Know what I mean?
The reason I lean toward GSM is if you remember, the original “Agenda” was for 2050 and was suddenly moved to 2030. This coincides exactly with what Kharkova originally though and postulated, but it got here 20 years earlier that expected, which she also stated. Their plans being cut by 20 years is a big deal and could be why they’re in such a hurry. Guess we’ll find out soon enough, unfortunately.