USA Today Deletes 23 Articles Following Investigation Into Alleged

#1

USA Today reporter fired for [fabricating 23 reports]

(USA Today Deletes 23 Articles Allegedly Fabricated)

Why would I post that? EASY ANSWER: Because USA Today refuses to post which 23 articles were fake. THAT MEANS: The articles served their agenda. But “Oh, now that the damage is done, we’ll scapegoat her and then publish all the points we can think of to prove we are legit”. Only no. No one is stupid enough to believe USA Today is legit. And all that happened is she went over to some other rag, WITH BONUSES, to lie more because she already proved herself worthy. USA Today can then hide from whatever damage they had her cause by using her “firing” as cover. Don’t blame US!!! we already fired her!!

#2

Lol, newspapers are paid advertisements period! Even the legal notices are frought with laced with and designed for, a purpose the exact opposite of what’s implied! Example a legal notice is to give notice but praying it goes unread right? Foreclosures we’re an example, building stuff you want to avoid litigating, so the intent is to hide it in fine print like everything else nobody has time to read nor the capacity to fully understands it’s implications. But you gave notice, met the legal requirement lol lol every news article is laced with politicized speech, designed to push psychological buttons evoke a particular reaction. If they are spending big bucks advertising there, you had better accept that the advertiser controls the text of every paragraph and it’s twisted to meet the purpose normally a political goal, and nothing else matters, not the truth not precision, not verification, it takes too long, clickbait rules, shock value is king, even making corrections is pointless, it’s so twilight zone now, it’s automatically the exact opposite of what is being said on planet hidden agenda…can the thought police lock us in a fema camp for talking about ET? Like he’s real? What if I have proof? Lol lol and so if I’m exposed, ET is outted, ??? It’s a done deal. I don’t think disclosure would be taken serious! Really!! I mean it! Looking at the dudes at the UAP conference they couldn’t convince the public of anything zero! No cred. Most folks already know anyway! And any disclosure would be so limited it’s going nowhere, too much to know it would just be confusing to folks. I’m thinking humans are already depressed, no need to put the heavy weight of aliens on us, could be too much to carry?

#3

We’ve seen this tactic used a lot in the past couple years. Say whatever you have to in order to get the result you want (whether it’s about biolabs in China, or “Russian collusion,” or whatever), and after the damage is done, say, “Oops, we were wrong. But you can still trust us. Yes, really.”