What We Already Knew About Reading and Intelligence(s)

The Chicago Tribune on how a society that stops reading stops thinking:

Neuroscientists have found that when people read, their brains don’t just process words — they simulate the story world. Functional imaging studies show that as a character in a book moves, sets goals or changes location, readers’ brains activate some of the same regions they would use to perform or imagine those actions in real life. In other words, to understand a story, the brain builds and constantly updates a lived simulation of it.

By contrast, social media rarely demands such deep simulation. Instead of sustaining a mental world, it delivers a rapid stream of novelty and cheap rewards — training the brain to skim, swipe and move on, rather than to linger, imagine and reflect.

One of those things sure sounds better than the other.

And yet recent data illustrate a shift in behavior that won’t surprise anyone — namely, that people are reading far less and scrolling far more.

Daily reading for pleasure in the U.S. has fallen more than 40% over the past 20 years — roughly 3% per year, according to researchers at the University of Florida and University College London.

The one bit of good news is that reading to children remained consistent over time. But given that this important stepping stone hasn’t yielded more leisure reading, something fundamental has changed.

We’re sure social media is a major culprit, siphoning away attention and time from more noble pursuits.

When Pew Research Center began tracking social media use back in 2005, just 7% of U.S. adults were using these platforms — today, nearly 70% are on Facebook, roughly half are on Instagram and 8 in 10 U.S. adults use YouTube. People are on these platforms for hours each day. Among teens, Pew reported that nearly half say they’re online “almost constantly.”

As people read less, opting instead for social media or other distractions, reading scores are also declining in schools. Twelfth-grade reading scores in 2024 were lower than in 1992 nationwide, according to National Assessment of Educational Progress results released earlier this month.

Turns out reading, like any other discipline, is a muscle that can atrophy if it goes unused.

We have skin in the game when it comes to reading. Of course we do. But more than that, we spend a lot of time thinking about this issue because a literate society is able to govern itself well and effectively; literate citizens can advocate for themselves, and they can champion causes that improve our well-being.

A society that’s not well read is also more likely to outsource tasks that require … thinking. We’re already seeing an increased willingness to forgo research and introspection in favor of deferring to AI — and concerns about artificial intelligence wiping out entire sectors of the economy is a common fear among many younger Americans, especially among those who just graduated and are struggling to find work.

But beyond that conversation, there’s reason to believe this trend has significant implications for society long term. Reading strengthens attention, memory and empathy by requiring sustained focus and imagination. Social media, by contrast, encourages rapid shifts of attention, shallow engagement and surface-level processing — which goes a long way to explain our decreasing ability to debate civilly and disagree.

If we want a thinking, feeling society, we must defend reading — with our habits, our homes and our schools. The simplest place to start: Open a book.

5 Likes

My thoughts are simple. They come from something I read this week about Atlas/ Atlantis.

  1. The best controllable population is a dumb one.
  2. A dumb society does not have an empty brain. They have a brain filled with useless disconnected facts.
  3. An empty brain is a threat to Government.

Smartphones (everything They say is the opposite) so ‘stupefying-phones’ are pushed, made a necessity for life, and social media is rammed down the throats of people who must take an active role in denying it.
This leads to a stupefying effect, as less people engage active parts of their brains by doing things like reading books.

1 Like

fun coincidence… my mom taught me to read at age 3 using a section on the cartoon page of the Chicago Tribune in the late 1960s

3 Likes

Yes.
It rewires the brain.
The result is less ability to deeply concentrate, and more importantly…
The ability for: DEEP THINKing.
[or, at the very least; becomes impaired, by degrees of magnitude]

1 Like

If people can’t even sit still to read some fun, very well these days, then it is an even bigger struggle to get them to sit still and focus on one thing only or even to have temporary empty-mind , doing meditation!

Reading is a good stepping stone to more intense mind training.

2 Likes

As an avid daily reader of books, on-line articles and Internet forums like Giza Deathstar, reading requires discipline, concentration, focus and an attention span. Scrolling and videos don’t count, and destroy these abilities and skills basically leaving the individual illiterate and unintelligible in a conversation, ‘like you know’…
Early church officials had to use symbols and magnificent stain glass windows to present the message of “the word” because most folks were illiterate. Ironic, mass education programs were successfully launched and then reversed over time to dumb down the masses. :speak_no_evil:

1 Like

It comes down to the early skill sets and wiring taking place.
In the computer; the rewards are encouraging, skip to another link.
Break the concentration, to another short reward.
Ironically, mimicking the West’s short-term, economic-gains.
[think stock markets]

’ The people were left in utmost slavery and ignorance by the wise counsel of the first of the philosophers of Atlas, who had written: “An empty brain is a threat to Society.” He had consequently instituted a system of mental culture, comprising two parts:

  1. As a basis, a mass of useless disconnected facts.

  2. A superstructure of lies.

Part 1 was compulsory; the people then took Part 2 without protest.’

1 Like

Yes, truth is mistaken for facts now and encouraged!

… see the literature on the manipulation of Brain Plasticity.

… to your #1
“Now … this” idea: the phenomenon whereby the reporting of a horrific event—a rape or a five-alarm fire or global warming—is followed immediately by the anchor’s cheerfully exclaiming “Now … this,” which segues into a story about Janet Jackson’s exposed nipple or a commercial for lite beer, creating a sequencing of information so random, so disparate in scale and value, as to be incoherent, even PSYCHOTIC (emphasis mine).”

― Neil Postman from Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business

2 Likes

Which has evolved to my 20something coworkers cheerfully proclaiming, only half in jest
TLDR

Too Long Didn’t/Don’t Read

Which has a positive side, then!
The human body is amazingly adaptable and healable. Especially the brain.

Richard Weaver mentions that phenomenon in his 1948 book, Ideas Have Consequences, resulting in information without context or reflecting reality, calling mass media a stereopticon-a magic lamp of deception.
During high school I worked as a projectionist at our town’s movie theater. Prior to the movie previews and cartoon reel starting the evening movie, there was a singleopticon for projecting glass slides with advertising of local businesses.

3 Likes

… Yep, one method of “dot connecting” is to look at the bibliographies of say Weaver and Postman and see if there is any overlap. This technique does not always work but sometimes one finds an interesting common thread or two of thought running through several texts.

2 Likes

Weaver makes reference in his text to authors and concepts I’ve never encountered. Makes for interesting reading looking them up. Like Joesph Conrad’s novel Lord Jim to contrast the southern genteel culture with the northern coarse culture.
His bibliography is quite extensive. The rabbit hole requires careful digging.

1 Like

That’s so cool!.. Incidentally, I learned how to “read” my mom around 7 years old…and by “read” I mean the subtle cues she’d give off that let me know I was too many pages in already so needed to shift my illicit activities more over on the sly before she took it upon herself to decide a new end for my story…

Example: There’s only so much water that one can use to “cut” one’s step-fathers Coca-Cola (in the glass bottles) before one is discovered and the jig is up…Hint: it’s less than half, probably closer to a third. Now you might think that if you’re super careful and clamp the lid back on “just right” that the blame might fall on the Coca-Cola company…but you’d be wrong. Also doesn’t help that you might have gotten away with it before. These are the kinds of things a seven year old just doesn’t have the experience to know.

So yeah, Public Service Announcement: Doesn’t matter how much you might be jonesing for a soda,Don’t try it.

2 Likes

Didn’t like soda pop but I had my own version of deception: I would put my mushy vegetables in my knee socks and go to bed. My mother would find them there in the morning. Apparently I did this more than once. My mom still tells this story and I’m almost 60 years old. lol

3 Likes

Totally agree, and it is a personal bugbear topic. Not only does a reduction in reading impact cognition and cognitive abilities (the practice and skill of parsing prose = comprehension and communication competency):

              " Summarizing 163 studies, the present coordinate-based meta-analysis confirms the         importance of classical left-hemispheric language regions and the [cerebellum] across reading tasks. We found high processing specificity for letter, word, sentence, and text reading exclusively in left-hemispheric areas. Subregions within the left [inferior frontal gyrus] showed differential engagement for word and pseudoword reading, while subregions within the left temporo-occipital cortex showed differential engagement for words and sentences" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001666 

but also , and synergistically, if accompanied by a reduction in handwriting/cursive, relying mainly on typing/keyboarding impacts cognition and cognitive capacity,

                "Results: Handwriting activates a broader network of brain regions involved in motor, sensory, and cognitive processing. Typing engages fewer neural circuits, resulting in more passive cognitive engagement."  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11943480/

If a population can’t communicate, understand, comprehend effectively, it can’t interact to organise effectively either. A remake of the Tower of Babel stratagem perhaps.

5 Likes

Nice one, Centurion! I like it

@MarkSean

Oh Hi Mark! See you’ve updated the profile pic…deserves a new greeting:

Forcing myself to stay on the subject now… Yes, reading, as they say, is fundamental. Without a substantial exposure to many and various authors/subjects, well… Jack will likely always be a dull boy.

They hide all the best stuff in books…

2 Likes