Whitney Webb -- Another Weird One

The entire surveillance grid system is exclusively Isreali owned tech, most of which was stolen from the US, given to the Chinese, and used to build the proto-system in CCP-technocracy land. Webb, once again, is apparently gaslighting.

“How about Whitney Webb’s Unlimited Hangout. That’s the in-your-face title again, isn’t it? Telling
you the truth while pretending it is a joke. No, the place is an actual Unlimited Hangout, just as it says.
You can tell that just from Webb’s name. The Queen was a Webb, so the new King is, too. And
Whitney is the same sort of name Webb is. Whitney Webb is both a Whitney and a Webb. The name
couldn’t be a bigger clue if it was Spencer Stanley or Stuart Rockefeller. I can judge Webb by one
article alone: her 911 anniversary article in 2021. It is the weakest of weak brews, though it had twenty
years to steep. Webb is where Naomi Wolf was about a decade ago, saying that we need to ask
questions. Yeah, Whitney and Naomi, I think that goes without saying. Except that some of us were
actually asking them 15 and 20 years ago, not just saying they needed to be asked. We were also
answering them definitively. There is a big difference, as you can see if you read her paper closely. It
has almost zero content, because she refuses to address even one fact. She doesn’t get anywhere near the question of a false flag or a fake of any other kind, her only implications being that the event was used for nefarious purposes. So she is playing the worst sort of rear guard here, being only a few steps beyond Matt Taibbi and his sad attempts to trip up those walking ahead of him. Although people like me solved this crime many years ago, Webb is making herself look brave by timidly suggesting maybe, just maybe, we should begin questioning it. That’s her whole assignment in a nutshell.”

The information is “out there”, who the messenger that does so is irrelevant. The individual gathers, collates and applies meaning to draw their own interpretation. Praising or dissing Webb is meaningless.

1 Like

Instead of bitter notes on you having had the answer to it all for so long, why dont you post that instead of this weak and meaningless tirade on her?
Im sure we all would love to know the facts

1 Like

Who are you quoting in your post? Just wondering if this is your view, or if you have lifted it from somewhere else and dropped in here without attribution.

1 Like

Every time someone uses the term gaslighting I have to look it up. It still does not not make sense to me.

Webb and Noami are shills and it’s pretty obvious when you take a look at them and listen or read their work. It is annoying because they make out that they are “alternative media “ but in reality they are just part of the establishment, a different part to the mainstream, the opposite side of the same coin. I wouldn’t mind if they had something interesting to say or unique point to make, but they don’t. Both lack innovative foresight and any imagination which is necessary to join the dots and see through all the disinformation and misinformation out there.
So not only are they frauds but worse still they are “boring” ones.
I am sure that someone will say that they like Webb or Naomi but to me they are bland and predictable.
But it is not a big deal just another irritant we face in today’s insane world where nothing is as it seems.

I know what you mean… i try to think of it in terms of the childhood insult repertoire… I think of the playground retort of “No I’m not, you are” or, “I know you are, but what am I?” in a kids argument and you are getting the gist of gas lighting.

At least, I hope so, or I’ve definitely got the wrong end of the stick :slight_smile: .

I don’t know why it’s called gaslighting, but my understanding of that is to tell someone what they have just expressed they’ve experienced doesn’t even exist, which can be really unsettling and confusing.

As in, if I say to someone: “I can’t understand anything you are saying!” and they reply with: “Oh no, you can understand me just fine.” I believe that would be gaslighting what this other person said.

Or, if someone says: “It’s raining today,” to gaslight that would be to say: “no, there isn’t a cloud in sight!”

3 Likes

The other context is that there is an ugly trend of demonizing contrary positions. So as an attack people sometimes say “that person is gaslighting” but I still have to look it up. Lol

1 Like

It’s probably being referenced incorrectly most of the time, seems like that is probably the case about someone accusing Whitney of this that I doubt that is true.

Slightly different may be to not even acknowledge another viewpoint, not necessarily saying it’s false but to just bypass what someone else has said and immediately express a different opinion, not sure if that’d be technically considered gaslighting or not.

This can be really annoying, I have experienced that some talking to one of my brothers when I may say “this other person is being really rude!” and he replies by saying “I don’t think they’re being rude!” Annoying because first of all, I wasn’t even asking for his opinion at all, and second of all, because this immediate response is basically him trying to undermine my experience as being false or non-existent, or acting like his perspective is always more accurate and important, which probably is gaslighting.

2 Likes

Found this basic description.

Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse in which a person or group causes someone to question their own sanity, memories, or perception of reality. People who experience gaslighting may feel confused, anxious, or as though they cannot trust themselves.

The term “gaslighting” comes from the name of a 1938 play and 1944 film, Gaslight, in which a husband manipulates his wife into thinking she has a mental illness.

Key concept is the ability of someone to cause you to doubt your own thoughts or ideas about yourself or a subject.
Basically a trust issue.

5 Likes