YouTube - Lord James of Blackheath, Speech on Foundation X (House of Lords, 01_11_2010)

#1

Sent to me by a friend, so I thought I’d share it here along with some questions. Please feel free to comment/speculate as you see fit.

Who is Foundation X? Are they a precursor to the Nazi International or some other globalist group? Why would they lend such a vast quantity of money and not expect interest on any repayments? Might this require a human sacrifice as part of the repayment? That is my friend’s speculation which he shared with another member of the house of Lords who said that was a strong possibility. This all happened 10 years ago. The speaker on this video is still alive according to my friend.

1 Like
#2

A negative view on the matter.

#3

So the guy who publicly revealed the proposed deal is discredited by the media and called names like he is a crazy (conspiracy theorist). Where I have I heard that scenario before?

3 Likes
#4

Lord James interview on Sky News.

#5

Another issue or is it all connected?

#6

Apparently, the money was stopping the final solution op planned in the near future?
The powers had the money; that wasn’t the problem for “them”.
The money would have helped the people/humans.
Can’t have that.
Next thing you know; the people will want accountability, and all that rubbish.
Why, the people might even want something akin to democracy.
What would happen to the tiny few who are destroying the world, and loving it all?
It has taken them thousands of years;
to reach this near future point, of absolute totalitarian technological control.

1 Like
#7

So, as, C.A-F. likes to say, here’s the thing; First of all, “X” may be a steganographic reference, and for that you might need to ask D.Liszt( “Drak Jrounalist”), as he is THE expert in those realms.
Secondly, the House of LORDS is NOT a place you just wade into to get a soundbyte, notwithstanding your BBC/KBE credentials/“seals( diplomas)”. In fact, one does not get in there, or even OUT of there, without express permission, or, failing that, PROOF of Lordship, past or present. Even, and perhaps especially then, the present Lords, that is to say the newly “minted” Lords, such as a “prime” minister or “chancellor of the exchequer( o my)”, will barely be Tolerated therein, if, indeed, at all.
Of course, those who have offices in this House, that is, those Who are Officers, and , yes, actually have an Office( or meeting-room), merely look down upon such process, and also even direct it as such. So, it will perhaps seem that all this is merely a “front”, or façade, and that perhaps, someONE in chàrge of the officers is “writing l’escript”.
Merely, and Just, my tuppence.

1 Like