~800 Years added on to history?

Hmmm
#1

I’ve not much to say on this other than a hypothesis from the researcher involved: Gunnar Heinsohn claims that the Latin/Italian Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire and the Holy Roman Empire were not separate empires that proceeded after one another, but rather the same empire existing at the same time. According to him, it was all essentially German. Also stating that the double-headed eagle symbolised this unified empire, one head watching over the west and the other the east.
Has anyone heard of this theory before? Is it fact?

For more on this, check out Static’s content here:

1 Like
#2

Edwin Johnson wrote books on the topic
Johnson “undertakes to abolish all English history before the end of the fifteenth century.”
Johnson contends that before the “age of publication” and the “revival of letters” there are no reliable registers and logs, and there is a lack of records and documents with verifiable dates.

Fomenko is beloved in Russia - widely believed to be more correct than incorrect there I am told.

there’s a good bunch of this.
i think the argument that we made up the timeline, wrongly, and have stuck to it
plus the printing press/control of research and writing as the ‘when that took place’
is a real fun rabbit hole.

1 Like