Dark Journalist & Joseph Farrell X-237: 9/11 Deep Event Exotic Technology Weapon Secret … 8pm chat room open now
9 Likes
This was a fantastic show, and I may watch again. JPF mentioned a 9/11 video on this site as well. I couldn’t watch the Vidchat live today, so I have to view that as well.
1 Like
Where is the video that JPF mentioned
1 Like
A truly great program tonight! Thank you!
1 Like
Snippets if one is not a memberr of Solari nor Giza Death Star.
4 Likes
@vardas3
Dr. Farrell,
I would like to assert some speculation here based on your interview and incidents of the same-day as reported by The Wire, as well as other sources. At minute 13:50 of your interview, you named 3 countries that are suspect in your mind with regard to 9/11 involvement: Saudi Arabia, Israel & Germany.
The Wire reports that Houtis have completely destroyed (for the most part) Saudi’s pipeline (on 9/10-9/11) and that MBS called Trump twice asking for intervention and that Trump refused both requests. Is it possible, aside from all else The U.S. might be trying to accomplish specifically with Iran, that Trump is exacting some sort of “retribution” upon Saudi Arabia because he feels they were deeply involved in the 9/11 attack? Is it possible that Trump knew nothing about the 9/11 plans until he took office and considering his close association with New York City (practically a love affair) and downright possessiveness of that city, he might be exacting some sort of revenge upon The Saudi’s for their part in the attack?
Will Israel and Germany be next on Trump’s retribution list? His denial of assistance to MBS (twice) leaves the Saudi’s in a position to be wiped out. While I’m sure there are other reasons Trump is involved in The Strait and with Iran, I have to wonder a bit about this possibility.
Do you have any thoughts on this matter? If so, I would love to read them.
Thank you!
2 Likes
Or perhaps it was just a test of the main offensive weapon of the newly built Death Star… though not in the visible spectrum, of course.
Just saying…
1 Like
Deep! Profound! Mind bending analysis!!
Nothing to add. Nothing to embellish. As complete as there is in tying all pieces together.
I don’t need anymore. That’s gonna marinade for a while. I got my fill in one episode.
Joseph covered all bases.
Only thing left for me is meaning. Reality vs Illusion. The Matrix. And being able to sit inside this morphic field of depth deception and evil and be at peace with it’s existence because it exists, therefore it is.
2 Likes
A very astute point, @beaver, and one that has popped into my mind of late.
We heard so much in the aftermath of the 9/11 “attacks” (they weren’t so much attacks as self-harm in my view) about the “Madrasas”, the schools throughout the ME incubating Sunni extremism, and the funding connections linking these schools House of Saud. Perhaps even NOW some Americans don’t realize or understand that Bin Laden was of Saudi heritage, and not of Afghani or Pakistani persuasion.
I personally find no form of comfort or satisfaction in exacting revenge on the Saudis. Whether or not they had a role in the 9/11 narrative makes no difference to me any more.
The young man who I was 25 years ago, embroiled in hatred and lusting for vengeance from the 9/11 event is replaced now by an older man, perhaps bitter and disappointed with advancing age, but now the burning red emotions are replaced with cynicism and deep suspicion.
I have turned 180 degrees and the certainty I had back then in my iron-clad belief that I knew who was to blame for 9/11 has been corroded, broken down alchemically and replaced with uncertainty and doubt, and an understanding that we have been for decades now, and continue to live in a (deliberately!) obfuscated and complex world dominated by 1 single axiom:
WAGE WARE THROUGH DECEPTION
5 Likes
Here is Richard Allgire being interviewed on Leak Project. The Leak Project interview was removed, but you can find it on their main website, although it is behind a paywall. Someone else re-uploaded that interview here.
Richard talks about how he saw a missile being launched, which is also discussed in the remote-viewing project by the Farsight Institute. You can watch that project, but Richard went further and said that he saw the person who pressed the button. Apparently, the person thought it was just a drill, but Richard says he saw the Israeli flag on the submarine. He then tries to backtrack, because I think he realizes that he is taking himself down a road that he does not want to go down.
At 19 minutes and 28 seconds, Richard says he describes seeing the Star of David.
The discussion about 9/11 as a target begins at 13 minutes and 20 seconds.
The three submarines that Israel had back in 2001 were:
INS Dolphin
INS Leviathan
INS Tekumah
Now, none of these submarines had the range to launch a Popeye missile at the Pentagon unless they were refueled out at sea, which I believe happened.
Public reporting links Dolphin-class submarines to long-range Popeye Turbo testing in May 2000.
Only Leviathan has a located, detailed public account naming a specific Dolphin-class boat on an undisclosed September 11 training voyage.
In May 2000, about sixteen months before 9/11, Israeli Dolphin-class submarines were reported to have conducted long-range cruise-missile tests in the Indian Ocean, with reported ranges approaching 1,500 km, or more than 900 miles.
Richard’s session starts picking up on the missile during his remote-viewing session, which I marked here:
He explicitly mentions “Popeye” at 46 minutes and 19 seconds.
TIME STAMPS
Daz Smith
6:30–7:52
He describes a “missile device” that is directed or aimed along a pathway. He describes a fast, controlled, man-made object moving through the air and says it feels like “some kind…” of missile-like object.
This is an independent missile-like description from the first viewer.
Daz Smith
16:27–30:28
He describes a sleek, hollow, compartmented object with internal parts, repeatedly comparing it with a bullet-type or controlled missile ending in an intentional destructive impact.
This adds structure, guidance, and impact imagery.
Richard Allgire
31:52–33:29
He describes a high-pitched buzz and says “vectors, missile guidance.” He describes a “thin, tube-like” object streaking across the sky with a whine and whoosh, and compares it with a cruise missile.
This provides an independent overlap with a guided-missile interpretation and an acoustic description.
Richard Allgire
42:51–46:34
He repeatedly says “Popeye.”
He describes offshore/water-launch imagery, including a stubby object emerging from the water. He says it appears to be submarine-launched, sketches and associates it with a submarine, and then repeatedly says “Popeye.”
The key specificity here is the submarine-launch imagery paired with the name later associated publicly with Israel’s alleged submarine-launched cruise missile.
Courtney Brown
51:52–52:26
Brown summarizes the combined sessions as indicating that a missile hit the Pentagon and notes that neither viewer described people inside the object.
This is Farsight’s project-level synthesis of the two blind sessions.
THE BIBLICAL NAMES AND WHY LEVIATHAN IS THE STRONGEST SYMBOLIC MATCH
Evidence boundary
The names and their scriptural meanings are historically real, but symbolism is not an operational record. This section explains why Leviathan became the strongest literary fit after the remote-viewing lead; it does not prove a mission.
INS Dolphin
The Israeli Navy explains that the name reflects intelligence, speed, navigation, and agility. It is the least threatening of the three names and the weakest literary match for a concealed catastrophic strike.
INS Leviathan
The Israeli Navy states that the boat was named not merely for the modern Hebrew word for whale, but for the monstrous creature of the Hebrew Bible. The imagery repeatedly joins hidden maritime power, fear, armor, elusiveness, and catastrophe.
Job 41 — the untamable armored creature
Job 41 depicts Leviathan as beyond ordinary capture or control. Its body is protected, conventional weapons are ineffective, and its awakening inspires terror. As symbolism, it evokes hidden, armored power emerging from the sea.
Psalm 74:14 — the many-headed force of chaos
Psalm 74 presents Leviathan as a chaos-monster whose heads are crushed by divine power. The passage gives the name a catastrophic association, while also showing that Leviathan is not automatically heroic or righteous.
Psalm 104:25–26 — the immense creature among ships
Psalm 104 places Leviathan in the great and wide sea among ships and countless creatures. The official Israeli Navy name history cites this maritime passage.
Isaiah 27:1 — the fleeing and twisting serpent in the sea
Isaiah describes Leviathan as a fleeing, twisting serpent and dragon in the sea. The imagery contributes secrecy, evasiveness, coiled movement, and a concealed maritime threat.
ISRAEL’S DOLPHIN-CLASS SUBMARINES AND SEPTEMBER 11, 2001
INS Tekumah
Tekumah means revival, restoration, resurgence, or rising again. The Israeli Navy describes the name as a return to life and a rising from ruin or crisis. A related form appears in Leviticus 26:37; in modern national usage, the name evokes the capacity to stand again after destruction.
Why Leviathan is the strongest symbolic fit
If the three names are treated only as literary clues, Leviathan is the strongest fit for a concealed surprise attack:
- It belongs to the hidden depths and naturally fits a submarine.
- Job portrays it as armored, untamable, and resistant to weapons.
- It carries associations of terror, chaos, and overwhelming force.
- Isaiah emphasizes a fleeing, twisting, elusive maritime creature.
- Its appearance is narratively catastrophic rather than ordinary.
3 Likes
Also, Curt Weldon said that Richard and Don were the planners. I think more like probably the ones running the show since Dr. Farrell did state in the show that a year or so before the attacks happened, that economist said a big attack will happen in the US that is worth like $300 trillion…but Richard did get data on Rumsfeld, where I provided the link to part 2 and you can see Richard describing Rumsfeld and some background info as to where he’s from…
2 Likes
Dutch professor Kees van der Pijl on 9/11. Yes this is dutch but has US audiotrack possability.
Good to have foreign thoughts on the subject too.
Following WWI, economic statistics was earnestly pursued to measure the positive effects on raising the standard of living for the masses when a country’s economy was in wartime mode. The increased profits and power of those companies producing the required war materials came to light.
Nothing has changed except the increase of power and profit of a wartime economy ever since. The other significant change was mankind’s ability of manufactured mass murder and the acceptance of the view of death, the natural end of a thinking monad. Mass murder had a place in economic theory. Let the good times roll….
3 Likes
These are the types of questions we handle in vidchats.
2 Likes
“you can go online and find video after video of thinly clad missiles slamming into concrete reinforced blocks and leaving the silhouette signature of them entering the concrete block”
Could I see some please ? The thing closest to it I found is this:
Not mentioning that civil Boeing airplane is much less solid than a fighter jet, designed to break through the sound barrier.
On the photos I have seen, there are no remnants of a plane either, most of the beams are not bended into the building, etc.
1 Like
Understood. Thank you.
I have not read doc’s book on 911 yet, so the link below may be familiar to many who read the book. None of the less it looks like mentioned players( Naval War Collage) can be situated between second and third layer of that operation.
Highly recommend going thru entire feed.( second link in blue color)
In Oct ‘97, a few years before 9/11, Cantor Fitzgerald and the Naval War College began co-hosting a series of economic war-games, initially held on the top floor of the WTC in Cantor's offices to prepare for a "Pearl Harbor-style sneak attack" on the WTC from an aircraft bombing. https://t.co/Enli91l92H pic.twitter.com/Q0WjjQ9VP7
— 3rdEyeSpies (@thallucination8) February 21, 2026
thanks for the dark journalist chat. 25th seems to be a little bit different than every anniversary before - mostly in the “allowable discussion.”
i personally posted a little conspiracy conclusion to facebook just too see how shut down it would be [my claims: yes planes hit towers, no plane hit pentagon, nuke in basement (heinz pommer model), it was both an “inside job” and an “outside job”]. I was shocked when 1 it was allowed and even boosted a little by the algo and 2 i received a fair number of likes and affirmative comments, zero dismissal or rebuttal. NOT what I was expecting.
why are we allowed to question the official narrative, to name Israel as a major direct participant NOW?
my “how did buildings come down” solid resources if anyone cares
bruce baird has super solid threads [Bruce Baird on X: "WHERE could the immense ENERGY needed to destroy the WTC on 9/11 AND maintain hot spots in the ground for 99 days have come from? Many observers have judged NO WAY could gravity & ANY chemical source (e.g., nanothermite) have provided sufficient ENERGY. So WHERE? Thread 1/" / X]
cirnosad thinks big and adds schizo flavor [Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 on X: "It has been exactly 23 years since the terrorist attack on 9/11. On that day one event seemed like magic: How did the WTC towers vanish into thin air? Like a cigarette butt! 🚬 This question will make you RETHINK reality! Forget jet fuel & steel beams. Thin… / X]
heinz pommer reads his book aloud (ground zero model GZM) [https://youtu.be/4xSvsKaM6uw]
I’m in the high likelihood of basement nukes camp. that there might have been other/more strange weapons (microwave, dew, scalar, sound resonance, tesla, whathaveyou) brought to bear OR have literally been what many are seeing/saying WAS the basement nukes itself seems high probability but so far much harder to know/nail down.
I think building 7 was supposed to come down around the same time the towers did, that one didn’t go off right and had to resort to a second effort to effect.