The EU needs to be returned to a trading block and council only …sweet Divine!
We are now getting a clearer sense of what UVDL means by European values… “EU member states could be punished, with ‘discriminating regions’ that do not comply with ‘values’ seeing funding blocked.”
Gender is fast-becoming, an elective.
One year this; next year that, and then it becomes a toss-up…
Or, is that the acutely-serous purpose?
“It” becomes mixed-up, by the time, “it” finally graduates?
Wow.
This is the Weimar Republic for an entire continent.
Of course it’s happening in the US as well, Europe is just a bit ahead of us.
One did not need a cristal ball to see that coming. I don’t understand people went for it on its inception, seems convinience wins over brainpower every time!
On the other hand with the current crop leading the union I wonder if they can keep the lights on for much longer. Registration of gender swapping might become a nightmare and frankly least of citizens worries. Showrunners have no idea of resources in relation to logistics, heck some have no basic math skills period!
Considering how the Republic 1.0 ended it’s amazing they’re trying it again. Then again evil is stupid.
If there was to be a changing of the guard along with full democratisation of the EU, it may have a chance. However, the leadership is doubling down so many repressive measures that I think it may disintegrate within 5 to 10 years. political fractures with Poland/Czech Republic/Serbia and Hungary. Financial fractures with Spain/Portugal/Greece/and several Balkan /East European countries. It is a veritable
show. Only thing keeping the posse together is NATO in my view…hence the war and support of war.
Considering the founding authors of the initial EU treaties, a Weimar 2,0 was probably inevitable.
I want it gone together with nato. Each country fully sovereign. Small cooperations might work like yesterdays benelux. Forget those big ones.
Now that would be an end state I would sign up to.
I’ve never heard a convincing reason for any of this. There was an old show from the 1970s I saw recently with Jodie Foster, she was maybe about 7 or 8 years old. Her voice has always seemed odd to me, very stilted, but in this show, which was probably one of her first, she was deaf and didn’t speak. In one scene, she walked out of the room and, wow – it was the gait of a boy, which had nothing to do with the plot. But the child was clearly a boy in a dress with long hair. So I looked into her history and found out that she was re-named for her mother’s lesbian lover, whose name was Jody. And it puzzles me. What’s the end game here? They obviously don’t think they’re harming humanity because they do this to their own children. But why? Reasons are thrown around, but none of them resonate. Am curious what you guys think the purpose of all this is.
Why “she” was green-lighted; aka, Hollywooded.
[IMO]
Make$ too much cent$…
BUT, that’$ “their” never-ending…
PROGRE$$IVE Bottom-line$…
…and gender-moving goal PO$T$!
But where do the profits come from?
It’s tied into their goals of the Transhumanist Totalitarian Technocratic State.
Vast sums are being poured into the above agenda.
That’s what they’re spending money and political capital on.
Gender has been part of the game for decades.
Part of destroying the culture.
Part of changing the language.
Of course, not expressly stated…
evil doesn’t make sense.
But these pay-loaded, platform-puppets, don’t give a damn.
The ONLY thing they understand is $$$$’$! and Power.
Talk about useful idiots.
I mean, destroying “Man”?
From EU wide “taxation” and dodgy contracts vaccines, testing kits, energy projects and soon weaponry.
Yes but how does gender fit into all of that? You can destroy culture many ways, why this one? Does the profit come from the sale of hormones?
Humans together are the fundament of culture in a balance between objective realities and inner world. Fracture that and there is no culture and sex confusion is a fast track to derealisation and depersonalisation.
OK but why do they want to fracture themselves? They like impoverishing us while holding all the wealth, but they’re willing to join us in the depersonalization. Why wouldn’t they remain above this particular form of muck?
I am not convinced “they” fracture themselves since I am having a hard time to find out who they are. What fractures themselves is just middle management pretending to be upper management.
Fair point… it seems like middle management holds many cards, but maybe not as many of the important cards.
… I have thought for a long time that in most cases the answer to quite a bit of adult human behavior can be found in the phrase
“I will be like the most high.” - but that is just me.
Context as follows:
from the KJV Isaiah 14:12-14
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
Also connected with this are L. Wittgenstein’s Forms of Life, Patterns of Life,
and Ways of Living and R.G. Collingwood’s notion of Absolute Presuppositions.