Take a little time to read a short history of money during the founding of our way of life.
Gold and silver coinage is the law and Congress’ ability to print paper money was forbidden, however contracting out the process at a later date was already anticipated and to avoid a confrontation they went along.
History shows what inflation does to a country’s assets long term. It’s theft.
3 Likes
reference: Report From Iron Mountain
CENTRAL BANKING PROPAGANDA.
Finally, THEY WILL KILL ALL OF US BEFORE THEY ALLOW THEIR SYSTEM TO “FAIL”.
GOD BLESS US ALL
1 Like
You can start by doing this first!
3 Likes
Money is often seen as a measure of success, but how often do we stop to consider its impact on our morals and society? From corporate greed to political scandals, the influence of money can sometimes lead to corruption and ethical compromises. But is money inherently corrupting, or is it the way we pursue it that leads to moral decay?
In the context of precious metals like gold and silver, how do they fit into this discussion? Historically, gold and silver have been symbols of wealth and stability, often viewed as a hedge against financial instability. Yet, they too can be part of the broader issue of wealth disparity and corruption. Does investing in precious metals offer a more ethical alternative to traditional financial practices, or are they just another aspect of the same system?
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this. How do we balance the pursuit of wealth with maintaining our values, especially when it comes to investing in precious metals? And are there ways we can change the system to reduce corruption linked to financial power?
1 Like
First off, welcome and thank you for contributing to the dialogues here at Giza and congratulations on your creative handle.
The one word that comes to mind regarding wealth and its accumulation and use is ethics, and how value, physically and spiritually, is used as a measurement.
Though both ethics and value have been in discussion for millennia, a consensus is yet to be had except through force, manipulation and persuasion; note our human history.
Currently tracking how money is used right on down to a person’s food item selection is in debate. Now we have freedom to choose added to the mix. It seems to be a circular argument between control and dictating what is and is not “good for the collective”, a conundrum.
Can we separate how wealth is used from how it’s accumulated using ethics? It seems to me the choices are individual therefore inalienable. Unfortunately that can lead to hoarding, theft and misuse. The individual is responsible for it all. Given human nature, some will be “richer” than others no matter the distribution, creation and values assigned to wealth. In my humble opinion…