must say nice share!, from few aspects … still text that projects wrong interpretation of his life and understanding …
Tesla in his time as scientists for sure was pulled by the prevalent socialpolitical and esotericalcultural trends on west, when indeed embraced the notion for technocratic superhumanity, yet didnt followed the rosicrucian blueprint for man-machine apotheosis!, but had have own understanding based on his practical insight as Orthodox Christian from his Childhood and his later intellectual contact with the vedic tradition, through which mindset was trying to postulate own understanding of physics for his inventions that obviously were indeed reached by state of spiritual contemplation, what was actually case since his Childhood … but by Ours Almighty Lord Providence it was given to us through him and his silencing enough slow scientific pace otherwise we would had have been already cyborgs [1][1] (use TOR browser for the archive.is/ph footnoted links)
on other hand einstenians were mostly deepen in strong rosicrucian vibe that as derived from the neopagan alchemic tradition were chasing precise man-machine apotheosis i.e. transhumanism that is reached by the means of western neopagan enlightenment era inertia, to which I’ll assume Tesla hasnt bowed thus was rejected as charlatan by “them”!, why I say this, simply “their” knowhow rests on reductionism and cartesianism, while Tesla embrased noncartesian knowhow i.e. didnt confined his experimenting to cartesian prism, what in effect was attack on the royal society (and its invisible rosicrucian college) scientific inertia, what for them was scientific heresy and especially coz the same was rolled out aloud in public by Slav as Nikola i.e. as enlightened elite “they” were foremost racist utopians [2][2][2] which saw themselves as western master race that couldnt accept that some slavic peasant ruled out “their” standardised knowhow!, altho defacto newton was “theirs” but “they” rejected his logic, while Tesla found ground through Maxwells line in his laws, still as could be seen from the proposed text even newton build his case from the keplers knowhow as forces in noncartesian system!
in a way Tesla was silenced probably due to his fast pace of inventions that threatened “their” unipolar imperial might at the time!, on top he was eager to free mankind from slavery, all his assertions for free energy goes in this line, so that was utmost huge risk for “them” and on one hand dismissed his physics while on other left him for a while to continue experimenting so would see what will come up with, and especially coz he was not using any known mathematical model to “them”, what in the end resulted with his scientific ban (by burning down his lab) and city custody (obviously giving him no room even for interstate movement), and I’ll juice up this assumption with the fact how he sabotaged the philadelphia experiment later once was called to assist!
now, with all my lowliness, coz dont have shear knowledge in physics, I’ll say maybe “their” cartesian system would be more complete and workable if had have 8 instead 4 dimension in “their” einstenian knowhow!?, for what projected to ChatGPT mine observational logic regards the basic physics [3] and maybe its applicable (tho I am not sure) to “their” knowhow, yet knowing how Tesla got effective defacto we should foremost have in mind his knowhow from which later is derived the scalar field theory (as radiant energy in noncathesian system) that once was rechecked by me with ChatGPT points to explainations for many events and processes in our reality!, do take time to check the next post and the pdf in it [4] and what to say maybe the answer lies inbetween cartesian and noncartesian systems or how where they could interact (hm go mix the umixable and enjoy the show) but I am nor physicist nor contemplate on the problem of someones neopagan lust for heaven on earth, thus dont need to chase the rabithole, tho its enough clarity for me so would dismiss “their” neopagan western scientificism as most comprehensive cosmological model to which sadly but all current academia blindly bows, hm cant imagine when will come the time for the einsteinians to admit that were in huge error, simply too many books and titles are brought on the same basis so instantly “they” would rest their case!, especially problematic coz as scientific peers of transhumanism that is in full inertia at the moment like that “they” would pause “their” so longed man-machine will for chasing apotheosis, what for “them” simply is not acceptable at all coz need stiff belief in “their” determinism so would have at disposal as many guinea pigs for “their” biotech experimenting!, just imagine mids all “their” current trial and error “they” would say voila all “our” physics polished for one century is wrong, yeah maybe if asteroid hits us and “they” and “their” deceptive might evaporates!
what I find interesting tho is how AlbertA twisted his gravity through various cartesian systems, what tho should be enough for every truly skeptic scientist to question the forced mainstream physics understanding as undisputable, luckily there are many that were but dont get any deserved attention but are instantly bashed as quasiscientists, for what latest example would be AlexU [5] anyway here is einsteins gravity castling so would keep his theory alive, yet again hit the wall, and after many are continuing to tilt on it as if with enough hits would break it and reach “their” eureka, yeah surely but in some bottomless pit where instead apotheosis will reach aponecrosis!
In July 1936, Albert Einstein and his assistant Nathan Rosen famously received a critical referee report for their paper “Do Gravitational Waves Exist?”, which they had submitted to the Physical Review several weeks earlier and in which they argued that the Einstein equations of general relativity did not allow for plane gravitational waves. This episode and the ensuing developments have been meticulously reconstructed by Daniel Kennefick, who also established the fact that the anonymous referee had been the American cosmologist H.P. Robertson (Kennefick [2007]), pp. 79–104).
Einstein reacted quite strongly to the referee report and withdrew the paper. Indeed, not every paper submitted to the Physical Review was reviewed in those days (Lalli [2016]), and it was the first time that Einstein had received such a report, despite having recently published two (not that uncontroversial) papers in the Physical Review (Einstein and Rosen [1935]); Einstein et al. [1935]). Einstein submitted the paper unchanged to the Journal of the Franklin Institute, but then—according to the recollections of Leopold Infeld, who succeeded Rosen as Einstein’s assistant in the summer of 1936—discovered a mistake in the paper. Robertson, who was a colleague of Einstein’s at Princeton, gave Einstein a decisive hint for fixing the mistake by “reinterpret[ing] [it] in a cylindrical polar coordinate system” (Rosen [1956], p. 172). Einstein then contacted the editor of the Journal of the Franklin Institute and presented him with a modified version of the paper in which the consequences drawn from the equations were fundamentally changed.[1] This modified version was then published and is the only extant version of the paper (Einstein and Rosen [1937]). The argument here is for the existence of cylindrical gravitational waves; plane gravitational waves are not discussed.
~
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00407-022-00295-6
…
in context (altho not fully in line with all assertions in the text) I’ll suggest another quote where the noncartesian logic is pointed regards the opposites of the neopagan cartesian logic that explains the interest of Tesla for the vedic tradition …
I can go on and on, but you really need to look into those sources with an nondualist mindset and I don’t want to repeat myself of what Ken had repeated over and over ad nauseum. Understanding the grand unified field theory as outlined by Greek, Indian, Egyptian Monists and through the giants of Electrical theory like Charles Proteus Steinmetz, James Clerk Maxwell, Oliver Heaviside, Nikola Tesla, Eric P. Dollard, and even some basic understanding of Topology will help one realize Henri Poincare’s model of projective geometry, is exactly how Magnetism is emanated ideologically without any real “movement” in the 3-sphere that people like Alexander Unzicker has promoted some sort of mathematical expression to explain and simplify nonlinearity of curvilinear emanations and come to realize that our vain tasks in linearizing nonlinear systems had trapped us in seeing the world as an unreal tangent space that doesn’t at first appears to obey basic rules of a naive objective sense based interpretation of the world through abstractions of measurements of attributes of principles as principles which is a reification fallacy.
~
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00407-022-00295-6
like hearing colors and expressing them by some fractal calculus … I assume for someone doable approach, yet for the bulk of academia just fiction!, just as it was for Tesla fiction their mathematical approach i.e. didactic symbol expressions of some physical observation!, now, where how to be found logic that by such math could be found common denominator for expression between cartesian and noncartesian systems I am not sure, if at all is possible!, simply we have “their” wrong determinism topped by stiff reductionism and above all pushed by apotheosis premises resting on wrong esoteric lusts pulled from the dark side!, so not sure whether is close to possible anytime soon even “their” a.i.'s to bring upfront practical reinventing of the mathematical wheel!
the problem simply is wrong or correct cosmology and from it derived physics and on it projected math, on the bright side, “they” do found “themselves” some work to do, however mediocre it is in its effects!
so if we want to reach noncartheesis system flow as Tesla was waving, then we need to expand the einsteinian 4D, but go reinvent his fallacies, maybe while drinking beer at the local maltshop 