Only 300,000 excess deaths in 2022? Sounds like a conservative estimate to me. Some of those 6.6 million “injured” people will probably be added to the death toll over the next few years.
Cumulative All-Cause Mortality vs. Projected Mortality in the U.S. since January 1, 2020:
Source: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-covid?country=~USA
Granted, it’s hard to say how many were from “covid,” how many were from jabs, and how many were from lockdowns and other parts of the “pandemic” response (resulting in deaths from despair, isolation, delayed medical treatment of non-covid diseases, killer treatments administered to “covid” patients, lack of exposure to sunlight/vitamin D, impaired immunity from constant stress/anxiety, etc.).
A conservative estimate?
Sounds like outright intelectual fraud to me, all those athlete dying, and the air pilots, and young adults, and ther is “only” 300 000 excess deaths?
What are they ignoring to reach such a low number?
The method of the research must be scrutinized to see where it was flawed, how it treated the data, and how it obtained it, in order to detect how they manage to supress the true number.
The better way to propagate a lie is to mask it as a half truth.
CAF’s Solari Report: DNA contamination has been found in both the new bivalent boosters as well as in the earlier monovalent injectables.
Will the manufacturers finally be held responsible?
Pushback South Africa:
Bombshell lawsuit against Pfizer 
With thanks to Natali and Clayton over at Redacted.
History: “British” white supremicist entitlement in South Africa fostered propaganda links between news and spy agencies, eugenic-pharmacological companies and vaccine-caused pandemics.
It’s the media, stupid!
[take-off on, it’s the economy]
Newspapers in 1909, started another international intelligence operation.
[Rottenchilds].
“Intelligence” has been traditionally associated w/the economic/political power base.
[Private power] IMO
Tom Fitton’s Weekly update for Judicial Watch:
Ahem…Not all British people are Villains, even if Hollywood insists on casting us as them in the movies… 
Lol, but the good guy is ALWAYS American.
In a perfect world…
Yes, five eyes…but I only have two and both of them can read between the lines… Unless- à moins qu’une dame française ne passe…
THis is precisely what i´m studying, the possibility that the so called Intelligence Services are in thenselves private interests, and work for other and diverse private interests, and their actions, choince, plans, projects and operations, also their goals and methods, their agendas having nothing to doo with the public good, but rather, working actively against it because, everything that is made for the greatest good of everything and everyone can be done in public, with nothing to hide or to fear, but anything, even the smallest intention of doing harm need to be hidden, to be kept secret, so that the perpretato doesn´t have to respond for his responsabilities, and the others can´t attest for themselves that it is actively working against them, to cause harm, to do evil, to destroyto deprive, to enslave and to poison.
We only need a single dose of full intelectual honesty and all those secret services will desappear instantly, because, if we make a law making state secrets a crime, since no state can be served by secrets, but, rather the opposinte, by being the the most transparent and open to scrutiny as possible, so that even the most skeptic mind could attest for him/her self all the honesty in the conduct, in the speak, and in the toughts of those in functions of power and influence.
Lets make a law demanding that everything, 200% of what is secret in the intellingece services be made open, and public, for individual scrutiny, analyses, and debate.
Is it serving the good of all manking, in a way so clear that even a child can see, and not a single intellectually honest person can negate?
Or is it working against this greater good of everyone for the lesser good of a small few, and the greater suffering of a great many?
Anything that isn´t 100% for the better of all living beings is a crime, must be punished, and extingueshed, and never allowed again.
Whith this single law, and single principle, and single choice, would end all private control of public future, resources, space, dignity, divinity happyness, beauty and life.
What do you think?
Lets make this together?
Balance is needed.
Both in the private and public sector.
Looks like were heading for some version of…
“The Google Archipelago: the Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom” by Michael Rectenwald.
Power rarely gives up any freedoms taken.
It only understands one language.
Balance is everything, we need a new kind of social organization where power can neither be captured by the private interests that work against the greatness of the many, and neither by public interests that want to weaken the individual, so that it can´t live without it, and don´t have the power to resist the public machine/state/government.
I´m worring on such a solution. Any contribution brother?
Just ordering Michael Hudson’s new book that tells the history of how your question was addressed.
How the bad money won[as in WW1, Rome, Greece, etc.]
His site is chalk-full of current and historical analyses of achieving balance;
or, how the bad money has been continually winning for the Oligarchies.