The International Panel on Climate Change( IPCC) is out of step with today’s apocalyptic zeitgeist."
The panel can’t use weather manipulation to help in their ‘predictions’ because it’s a weapon of war and as such, can’t be harnessed to prove trends of weather or climate. If nothing else, weapons of war are a scare tactic for the fear pornographers. Since it’s the International Panel on Climate Change being discussed, conjuring up a little plausible deniability may not hurt their image/credibility.
“Bear in mind that on a topic as complex as climate change, a survey is hardly a reliable guide to scientific truth, but if you want to know how many people agree with your view, a survey is the only way to find out.”
Also bear in mind I’m not a fan of the Fraser Institute but even ‘a stopped clock is right twice a day’.
Thanks very much for these links. I attended a meeting 30 years ago where the after dinner speaker was Dr. Ball. At that time I was a strong believer in the human caused climate change narrative. It was a real eye opener for me when Dr Ball went through the historical climate data of the Hudson’s Bay Company that clearly demonstrated significant climate variability in the past .
What I found interesting about Pielke’s substack was that despite all the politics and corruption in the IPCC even their data does not support the current media climate hysteria except for extreme heat.
Am wondering about if we are going to see any significant sea level rise, with the climate models that predicted multiple feet of rise in seas just the ice melting wouldn’t be enough to cause that. It is the thermal expansion of water volume at higher temperatures that accounts for 60-70% of predicted sea level rise after/if all the ice caps melted.
If the earth is a ball, the volume of that sphere is way way more massive than the volume of known oceans on the surface, so if there is an edge of the surface somewhere into even a little inner earth cavern that would be more than enough to deal with overflow so there wouldn’t be anything like the catastrophic costal flooding people have talked about.
Good point regarding plausible deniability, it would not surprise me. I would sure like to understand the causal factors behind the extreme weather we are experiencing in British Columbia. At this point I have landed on natural variability enhanced by weather manipulation.
That’s right feels like the IPCC corruption is episodic. Maybe ethical researcher are pushing back , like Tim Ball explained you could produce anything has long the conclusion fits the higher level committee narrative. Hey maybe ,like the covid doctor, they red pilled when they saw Klaus “Reset” Book hahahah 
I certainly remember this back in the 70’s as a teenager. My my, how fast the climate changes.
