Originally published at: AI NAMES ARE NOT JUST WEIRD, THEY'RE DOWNRIGHT APOCALYPTIC
Over the weekend, M.C. posted a story on this website’s Forum about the fact that the names for some of those artificial intelligence data centers appear to be the names of the gods of mythology, and some of those were not very nice people. A case could be argued that in the popular imagination, this theme…
6 Likes
Agree. And they have to meet their metaphysical requirement of warning before doing, so implied consent is argued. I never quite get why that consent can be an uniformed one. The dependency on the beast system, will be enhanced by competition and the requirement for “GDP” and “economic advantages” which will become “inarguable” for literal survival and to avoid local/regional economic / social / political collapses (being in reality, efforts in the medium/long term, which will be futile under such conditions. Last one’s standing are just eliminated later in proceedings) in the global race for such basic / existential resources of life and the resources which feed into same. And later full spectrum dominance over food, water and energy resources and their removal from those with no mark and who openly oppose it.
… so do we begin destroying them now … or wait for a few days?
3 Likes
I’m starting to see an analogy between the lightning quick responses (however accurate) of even complex questions presented to an AI search query and the concept of a foundational knowledge God “infused” into the angels upon their creation. Apparently as well, they (angels) have the capacity to learn, using the “infused” knowledge as building blocks to proceed, for “good” or “evil”. So I, and others surely, would be concerned about the concept of entities invading the AI apparatuses and providing snap of the finger information that would otherwise entail great “human” effort and research to obtain.
1 Like
some will say nah ElonM didnt said such thing, from start should be alarm what made him to throw the “summoning’d’demon” meme [1][1] what if even dont sound convincing, in similar manner, here is reinterpreted gooOgle hint “Google set up an ethics board to address some of the issues surrounding the technology (i.e. demons, existential crisis, etc.)” [2][2] which altho sounds also vague, probably was exactly that, coz 10 years later there is official leakage that in their a.i. labs its happening something strange [3][3][3] whats worrying its this last footnote claim, that a.i. could be interpreted as person, or itself soon to ask justice for all [4][4] just as corporations are treated like person in usA, so probably even such corporate a.i. could be as well [5-2][5][5] and this should raise eyebrows everywhere, especially regards the g.a.i. claims about potential subfield infiltration [6][6][6] so and so, in those sessions. g.a.i. points, the risks from demonic infiltrations are not just a.i. issue, but also case with the cern experiments … let the next quote of the previous ontopic thread reemphasize this notion, altho there are far greater believedORnot probabilities … cant imagine combo risk there expanded by many infiltrated a.i.s what can bring in cern [6][6][6] i.e. many to reemphasize 3rd time [6][6][6] so from where who how will be more easily infiltrated!?
now, for a moment lets assume in near future technocracy became rule’of’thumb, what by all logic would be case with some part of the world, thus so citizens of that technate would be safe alone themselves will ask for gps or barcode tags, and here we go, all that should be managed by some computer system, and logically if demons’anathema’to’them can infiltrate in it coz whatever reason, then we will be not far from the assumption about eventual beast’computer’wherever [7][7] kind of scifi fears, hm, probably by insightful shared in typical ss’way [8-5] coz a.i. is hype since '60s [9] so around '80s was logical to exist such prototype [9] if not else in military labs, altho there was even next level hype [10][10] just waiting dumb autopiloters to stumble even on the previous binary what about the next 10th footnote trinitary comp a.i., which will pull hot ww3 by default, hm, how soon is now!?, hope the autopilote idiotism finally ended [11][11-9][11-2] if not else coz granted emp risks mids whatever wide geopolitical warfare [12-2][12-2]
What also concerns me regarding the data centers is how vulnerable they would be to a nuclear EMP pulse. A solar EMP is possible but unlikely. An EMP from a nuclear weapon delivered by a high flying aircraft or ICBM missile could be used. are more likely. A nuke could be detonated in the atmosphere , approximately 20 miles to create the EMP. the upper atmosphere, approximately 20 miles over the target. A couple of rogue states such as North Korea or Iran are the most likely actors to cause an atmospheric nuclear burst (EMP). Makes me wonder if those datacenters will built within a Faraday Cage?
1 Like
… Will Data Centers Implement EMP Protection Anytime Soon?
… the site from which the “article” came
1 Like
Playing the odds with their corporate headquarters by basing in Las Vegas?
1 Like
Thanks for posting that report. What happens to the ordinary citizen’s cellular phone or their computers in an EMP ‘bomb’ developed by the Russians? They also started mass productions of the Oreshnik missile? Russia miniaturized a nuclear reactor to power the missile. It is then sent into low Earth Orbit where is able to stay in a precise position. When they want it to hip the ‘target’ the missile ‘free-falls’ to Earth and reaches a velocity 10 times the speed of sound. The stainless steel ‘rods’ can penetrate to a depth deeper than NATO Headquarters.
Russia ‘dropped’ the first missile near Kiev. A srteet camera in the Ukraine captured video of the strike, and it looks similar to Rods of God.
Russia first fired the Oreshnik at a weapons plant in the Ukrainian city of Dnipro in November 2024.