Originally published at: CAN YOU SAY "RETROCAUSATION"?
As I stated on Monday, this is one of those weeks where all the important stuff is falling off the radar as everyone is focused on the Israeli-Iranian strikes and counter-strikes, and this story is one of them, and it may contain some implications that run into the “whopper doozie” category, but that will have…
6 Likes
There are several points to address here. This is exactly why vector calculus and its extensions cannot effectively describe physics that’s centered on mediums, nor can tensor systems based on vectors. Traditional attempts to combine holistic and reductionist perspectives often bring Newtonian or Minkowskian topologies—like Euclidean 3-space plus 1-dimensional time, or 4-dimensional spacetime—into biology through phase-space embeddings. But these methods treat manifolds as just mapping surfaces, overlooking the physical reality of energy quanta and confusing time with a spatial dimension.
All of these approaches rely on simply adding together dimensions (for example, S = x³, T = t¹, A = S×T, or a flattened S = x⁴). This additive structure can’t capture the generative, multiplicative nature of energy continua—the “medium” itself. Flat, additive models can’t represent distinct energy manifolds, account for energy conservation across both space and time, or support any theories involving negative time or “negentropy”, the latter being a New Age idea with no scientific basis.
Instead of seeing energy as a function of already-existing space and time, it’s more accurate to see Space (S) and Simultaneity (Γ) as properties that arise from energy itself. Here, l³ represents a volume element, while t² encodes the synchronicity of two independent time dimensions (such as resonance or repetition rate). The t⁻² term introduces a logical structure for phase-time reversals, treating time as an independent manifold, an idea necessary for concepts like time travel or Kozyrev-style models of Time.
In classical thermodynamics, irreversibility was tied to increasing entropy. But Aspden’s reading of Henri Bergson places irreversibility in the very structure of Time, a one-way phase-lock in the universal aether that applies to all processes, whether reversible or not. So, Time itself is irreversible, but the many phase-locked sub-continua of phase-space and phase-time aren’t, opening up more straightforward ways to think about teleportation and manipulating time.
The “arrow of time” we talk about in probability is just a convention. Real Time has no beginning or end; energy is eternal, so entropy doesn’t determine the direction of time. Our lived, intuitive sense of simultaneity comes from all material flows being locked to this universal phase-flow of massless energy. Einstein’s relativity confused local clock matches for simultaneity, but true simultaneity needs an invariant, third dimension of Time and time, similar to the Orthodox distinction between Essence and energy, or Light and light, or Space and space. This is the real approach.
As if it wasn’t apparent enough already, I despise 20th century quantum mechanics and I will make war on it unto death.
3 Likes
Wowza…I can tell my normal Ginko tablet is not going to be enough for this thread. 
Maybe I’ll osmotically absorb just a little of this.
2 Likes
@abellache and I went into this in detail about a year ago in another thread, so feel free to check that out for the full breakdown. We started by laying out the standard definitions and covering the basics. I’ll explain the dimensionality problem in vector calculus step by step. I also shared some thoughts on Relativity—specifically Levi-Civita—in a vidchat, which you can find in the comments section around when Demon in Ekur was released. I’m on the same page as Farrell and others about Time being an independent force with its own bidirectional flow. That said, I really think this crap around quantum mechanics needs to be cleared up, it’s a nonsese catch-all for everything exotic and it DOESN’T WORK.
2 Likes