forgot to add here the AFT++ logic as ontological clash between two physics models of reality, Aether vs Atomism, and on/for then derived Math …
-
sointhenextfootnotesgoctrl+f>“Math”[1]sowouldgrasphowthisisexplainedmoreneatly,alsotryinthenextexpandedfootnote“Atomism”[2]ortryctr+f>“Math”or“Particle”inthenextone[3]~[3]~[3]~[3]~[3]~[3]~[3][3][3][3]orcoztheserandom3rdfootnotes(ofallg.a.i.sessionssharedhereonGDSmostlyinOnPhysicsthread)arethebasicflowofAFTexploration,YoucanaswelljumpdirectlyintheAFT+[4]andAFT++[5][5]andchasewhereismentionedMathinAetherFieldcontext…herelogicallyMathismentionedincontextofphysics,butitgivesnicepivotaroundtheformalunderstandinghowis/couldbeusedintheoryorpracticeandwhetheritcanbypulledclearlinebetweengivencalculusorsymbolfluctuationmidsmodernflatmathinterpretationofreality,i.e.whatwewouldneedtoreachsomethingsimplecleanandeffective,justlikeincomputercodding,sowewouldderiveexplainandimplementgivenmathas/inunifiedfieldtheoryforallsciences…maybea.i.canhelpcalculatethings,buteventuallyourinputandagreedsystemformeasuringandcalculationwilldeterminewhethersuchfeateventuallywillreachshearUFTscaling…
still up until fundamentally its not de’dogmatized the modern reductionism of modern atomists, along their mechanistic cosmology, which shaped all later mathematical inertia, we cant even imagine to release ourselves of the very same traps of mainstream science yeah maybe good start is to make jokes with their founders, coz eventually joker was the prime one
democritus some say [6] tho whom to me looks like borrower from east, so probably its not the first one, even tho we are embracing him as such, i.e. if pythagoreans were borrowing from persian, then why atomists would not borrow from the indian realm [7] altho if as can be seen in the 6th footnote video they’ve describing aether alike continuum too, but probably later fell in the trap of reductionism till atheism!?, still, think in practice they were explaining the shapes of the atom spirals, and not per’se electrons, thus aware that the electron is the friction of the wave circling in that shape!?, at least we can assume that that was case, coz couldnt anyhow else explain, guess what would see with open spiritual eyes, as fine structure of matter observed while diving down astral!?, guess they derived such ideas exactly like that, probably under influence of particular hallucinogenic herbs!?, the same kick is present example among mesoamerican indians later, who used mushrooms so would dive in the structure of things, while cactuses for seeing the purpose of/for whatever!, probably You think in bronze age or antiquity the aegean civilization was not shamanic in posture, or that philosophers were just seating and gazing in the sun and stars, think twice!, anyway, how we would explain the next conclusion, hm, want to see exactly from witch source is derived! [6] i.e. so, ancient atomists were referring to the shapes of atomic spirals if this is true … “Atoms as they understood them were eternal, impenetrable, and incompressible matter too small for the human eye to perceive.
They come in various shapes and move about in continuous motion, eventually coming into contact with each other. If the shapes are compatible they are able to interlock and form vortices. From these vortices come the myriad phenomena that populate the universe , this includes our world, our body, and even our soul.
The phenomena are not eternal as they change and rearrange; it is only the atoms themselves which remain eternal. The atoms must have something to move around in; this is what the atomists would refer to as the infinite void. ”
i.e. even atomists from antiquity kind of align to Aether, i.e. when seen from modern perspective regards the dynamics of vortex mechanics through similar shapes!, so, only modern atomists and all till nowadays hooked to that wrong reductionist mantra are in vast