The machine; aka., algorithms, are being put into place to rule by fiat.
The question of whose governing; is really:
Whose writing the code being implemented?
Because, a lot of code is now being writing by algorithms.
Then is question becomes; are they really algorithms, or, something else?
I doubt “they” are machines.
But machines are an excellent scapegoat.
And scapegoats and patsies; are “their” standardized stock and trade.
Earthlings don’t have quantum computing hardware/software.
in fact, the above terms are only metaphors for “something” that isn’t in the realm of quantum computing.
It’s a wannabe skeleton/ w/o a conceptualized key to what shape or form is needed for quantum computing.
If anything; it’s outside the box - it’s Schroeder’s cat “mentally captured” in a quantum state.
In fact, the qubits “states”; via algorithmic representations, just look like a Potemkin Village metaphor.
If they’re actually getting close; it will be in the holographic sphere of higher dimensions. Not physical. But mental. [IMO]
Some of you might know, or, not, that I’ve been studying English sentence structure & other lingo with regard to AI, compared to human writing. Well, LISTEN TO THIS! Whether you like him or not, he’s absolutely right about the Chat system and has tested it pretty well. Very scary and is here, NOW!
1 Like
Hype personified.
Although, the control factor is way beyond…
20 characters.
1 Like
No hype from Peterson. I’ve been watching this and he’s right.
The software development process is always about automatisation of all and everything: & most modern software tools do indeed propose very high level tasks, including socalled “A.I” which is often not so intelligent.
But I’m not sure it is going much further.
Think about “ChatGPT” being excluded from stackoverflow:
Also, recently I’ve been forwarded very interesting article, how the Go playing A.I.“superhuman level” has been “hacked”, finding out blind spots of the “A.I.” And then, it’s even stranger as in some cases, it’s starts to derail completely and play complete nonsense, way below beginner’s level (specially the end of the last example game) :
Adversarial Policies in Go - Game Viewer
In the same direction, I’ve read that Artificial Neuronal Networks “recognizing” eg animals can be tricked by a single pixel.
And this understanding brought me to continue some intuition about US politics (although I do not know much about since I belong to the “Old World”).
What if TPTB think like machines, either using them or just being trapped in their own stiff power play shemes? But having comparable blind spots as those “A.I” ?
And what if humans (or maybe some bigger players) do not follow the standard patterns? And make a lot of apparently sensless moves and noise?
Eg, what if the one important point about POTUS 45 was precisely his abrasive non-diplomatic behavior? I mean, how would you better wake up big parts of the population lost in comfort, illusions, desparation, drugs and internet-addictions?
1 Like
I expect many humans initially will be in awe with AI and ChatGPT, but I believe its flaws will become apparent too. Many of our leaders are depersonalised and derealised and don’t seem capable of much analogical thinking. Today, predominantly Western society is at the stage that our leaders scream something must be so, and same leaders plus many of their flock, then, believe it to be and or becoming so.
Whatever the reason, many leaders made a pact with the Devil, sold their soul if you will and their flock are under the spell of powerful manipulation technology and or poisoning, often damaged psychologically as physically. I like to believe, free will and the heart are connected in a important way, which is absent in technology and non functional in damaged humans.
I believe the many humans that can retain their humanity by not damaging their physical bodies will be able to compete with AI in the near future and those grandized AI advantages will dwindle away.
This is afterall a spiritual war with the human body squandered as some derogatory thing to be thrown away, I beg to differ!
4 Likes
Ask AI to produce a heartfelt essay about any idea or experience?
1 Like
Seems like AI is doing just fine to me. Look at the articles and videos posted on this site.
LOL! “flatlander” huh? Well, okay.
Bill Joy told us that “the future does not need us.” That of course means that the technocrats can techno without us. That said, if this is the future they have planned, then obviously our future does not need them.
2 Likes