Philosophical Assumptions

I think this kind of thread could be beneficial for GDS, if not else like insight in the basics of Research Methodologies for all that are trying to puzzle in or out some mosaic of theory or theories, especially when in question are alternative historical topics …

be patient find time at least to look around the next links if have intention to dive in some true exploration of particular strange ideas or need for revealing discoveries, for what most suitable approach would be mosaic reasoning [1][1][1] altho from experience would say have in mind that the brain can take You hostage if its loosen to tilt out chasing extremely final solution/s,coz the problem of this kind of reasoning is always how and what kind of info someone has gathered, whether true or false and/or real or phantasmagorical > altho the line between all these axioms is so tin that we can never be certain what exactly will come out from the hypothesis in the end < especially not in alternative historical religious technological etc. research i.e. one need to be always open for revisions postrevisioning or complete pause of the researched, simply sometime it takes time things to settle so we can find maybe the right alignment of the mosaic pieces!, what counts in the end is did someone come from all that fulfilled with Joy what usually comes if the work is done rather from love for some knowhow than profit or pride, altho if too much energy is wasted in the process we are reverting the exploration coz exploitation, and thats why is better working in group, equal preferably, but eg. on this eForum I dont see such debates, not sure about the Vidchats (still not member), tho the very categorization and moderation of the platform cant open huge room for neat fractalization of topics and knowledge, tho
understandable why, yet even 100 Docs would pop up throwing balls and sticks around still the carrots will be hard to be packed in the right manner, what about now when many of us here are just half-literate funs of JPF knowhow, but at least we can try to balance our ideas more creatively smooth, and for what maybe this kind of thread can come handy …

  • Theory

Philosophical assumptions relate beliefs about ontology (the nature of reality), epistemology (what counts as knowledge and how knowledge claims are justified), axiology (the role of values and ethics in research), and methodology (the process of research) [2]

  • Practice

1 Like

as already mentioned its better to narrow the approach of examination firstly on mainstream or revisionist and postrevisionist theories i.e. to find where own hypothesis flow, and then after by examining the prevailing theories in the same hype to build up own hypothesis, that when gathered enough evidence or assumptions that points to probable resolving of particular mystery like that to be reached stable theory, that again surely will be ridiculed by many, but as every new thing its takes time to be fully accepted as relevant substitution for the prevalent trends!

thats why I like the fractal exploration of JPF on topics and theories that interwove in one unified theory of everything, and like mosaic of books gives in the end so vast clarification of our reality that even everything is still not clear to me from his reasoning still only by few tesserae of book titles life gets beautiful by the accumulated revelations on top I (we) have the privilege/s to ask him for further elaborations on whatever is not clear in the Vidchats, even more to engage in our own explorations here on GDS so would test our own knowhow!, Respect for the approach as Cosmic Explorer to find time and will for etool like this eForum, eh if only all prolific authors to had have such mindset, ideally every Fruitful PHD in every realm of our societies, eh maybe then we would see if not else some clarity on the horizon about many current deadends that hold hostage our chance for better tomorrow, compared to the sacramental life what would be not just confession of knowhow poured in a book but also active continual consulting with the Spiritual Father and the Likeminded community so would be reached Metanoia as fast as possible and like Life To Get Wonderful as much as possible!!!

hm, this last logic was for a while pushed by me as most needed approach for our modern societies i.e. to be implemented on all levels eTOS reality [1] when many insightful in some field would join forces on academic ngo or institutional eForums, yep imagine 100 alike Doc’s like JPF actively debate on GDS on all of his books as subforums with threads for every specific chapter and juggle all the relevant mainstream revisionist and postrevisionist theories on the subject in question, when would be delight to learn that everyone altho maybe on the same page still have own view of/on the mosaic and through it subjective analysis on the objectively proposed theory!, in the end such emergence will bring even more clarification and happiness coz simply one by one examining some eg. problem or deadend its for sure extra waste of time that otherwise could be used for hiking to other dimensions of our fractal reality and/or fractal dimensions in or beyond our realm of existence!, maybe like that we can grasp more easily how to plug the Tesla Spirit Radio in plasma turbine (maybe turban oon (UN) the head) yeah everyone then could become false prophets [2][2] “hello nephew please I need one afternoon Prayer so would climb to the nearest mountain from this other side of the life” would message the 5 century crossed away ancestor :slight_smile: that maybe in return would thanks with remembrance of some historical fact eg. where his gold was buried before the afterlife …

practically this thread is result of particular need to elaborate one recent tartarian hypothesis of mine [1] to some extent closer to some lets say mainstream basis from the past century where is mentioned one interesting detail which is pivot for locating pelasgian genesis for tartaria (see the next paragraph) … and probably many would say ha he is biased coz have pelasgian origins, but that would sound like mezzoamerican flow relates nowadays with eg. canadians, yep there were huge influences in the past, but btw through the centuries inflow from europe changed extra on the go!, still what is different with the balkan peninsula is that somehow stayed as always unconquered for good by invaders or once they succeeded to hold grip here for few centuries (eg. the subjugation by the ottoman empire) couldnt impose complete cultural assimilation or genetic sweep, even less spiritual mopping!, thus I can freely say here we have continuity of dozen millennia since eneolith onwards, what could be reconstructed easily by the ornamental art (eg. the heliolatric cult present as on the rock art so as the neolithic seals and the after the macedonian sun from antiquity and day after the standardization of sun’day as 7-th day for rest in the week by Saint Constantine The Great in Byzant (altho had have done that in Milan) and later also we can see the very same sun from antiquity in various forms as specific stamp for the iconographers here typically used on The Icons Of Mostholy Theotokos) also there are many other niches that point to such histo-cultural continuity, but in this post I would not elaborate such knowhow but will try to examine whether mine assumption have right basis so would offer correct hypothesis maybe one day pushed till provable theory, what tho will ask for quite big academic puzzling of everything available as historic sources and archeological recognition, hm maybe that quite is not reachable thus dont have high hopes, yet I would be happy to share my reasoning and get factual verification or constructive challenging!

for this kind of conclusion, that tartarians are brothers to pelasgians, first pivot is the 1835 book of William Pinnock “a comprehensive system of modern geography and history” where is suggested that tartars deduced their origin from Japhet the son of Noah [2][2] now if that is case and pelasgians are also lineage through Japhet as his nephews from his son Javan [3] i.e. Dodanim and Kittim would be per se pelasgians as settlers in the balkan peninsulla [3] while Elishah was in Italy and Tarshish (wait a bit for the geographic location) all of them supposed that are the line of the white race, now, my subjective assumption why tartarians claim that are also line of Japhet would be through his nephew Tarshish eventually [4] and many speculate that his location as tribe was in iberian peninsula, but if they had have gold or iron then as tribe from iberia surely there would blossom the iron age, on contrary in the Black Sea there were tails about the golden fleece, and there by all the mythology are found pelasgians in my understanding as native around the Black Sea i.e. they were first who brought the iron revolution in play (the socalled sea people in the bronze age [[url=https://www.worldhistory.org/Philistines/]5[/utl]][5][5]) if its taken the argonaut myth and where argonauts were chasing the golden fleece [6] when defacto as their arrival in Colchis and in age of shift from bronze to iron they surely didnt chase gold but something that could bring extra gold easily if used in war [7][7] yep what did they search there, maybe as I am trying here to find whether the root TAR is same for tarshish and tartaria knowing where is tartary and knowing how some tartarians said they are from the Japhet lineage!, so here I have assumption from the upper 2nd footnote book assertion that if such empire existed it was from pelasgian origin, and just then later the remembrance of its might was projected to the newcomers who as turkomongols there took the naming of the conquered territories above the Black Sea later known as tatars when tho coz mixed with the native population kept the myth about their origin as white race lineage … long story short all these axioms can be true or false and I cant attest discovery per’se but can assume this is more probable than possible explanation for tartaria and tartarians, altho far from the modern fantastic lore about lost advanced civilization, even less dugin alike attempt to be built modern sinno-russian bound by ancient cybelle archetypes and his turanian hype [8] that can easily slip in tartarian alike hypothesis of his, yet be creative and do check this logic of mosaic reasoning and give Your own idea am I far from reaching theory or there is firm basis for further exploration!?, eventually such flow could lead to constant reshaping of this mosaic in various combinations due to various assumptions or claims from various sources, hm, maybe some a.i. could juggle out such feat more easily, still for me like historiographic amateur its pretty possible hypothesis …

now compare to this kind of mine reasoning eg. extremely imaginative hypothesis like the next one [9] (search in the link turanian or tartarian) and continue exploring this topic in whatever way You prefer, philosophically assuming can we bring for so long twisted and falsified historical sources through the centuries like pivot and through it bring theories!?, hm, just in the 2nd footnote derive some claim as pivot and coz sounds convincing to my subjective understanding where pelasgians were thriving to colnclude thattartarian civilization was actually pelasgian i.e. belongign to the pelasgian substratum of people …