would any eventual revisionism bring back mendeleevs flow for aether as first element (noble plasma gas) in the periodic table “Dmitri Mendeleev, the founder of the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements, foretold the existence of elements X and Y in Group 0 … In the present work, element X is identified as the aether, and the element Y as the electrigen” [1] i.e. as “D.I. Mendeleev assumed the existence of elements X (Newtonium) and Y (Coronium) in front of hydrogen in the zero group of the periodic system of chemical elements (PS)” [1] aside that the way how the periodic table is structured like that could also bring alternative forms [2] at all how electron clouds behave by different basis can bring different outcomes, first of all coz they are seen as particles [3][3] instead to be evaluated just as waves of photons [4][4] what if it is case surely such noble gas as aether could become the pivot as base for all other elements, even it was called newtonium [5] melting the current particle physics instantly, which tho already by the failure of the lepton universality is already turned from sand in dust [6-4] waiting just joint official consensus so particle physics would evaporate from the text books as ultimate answer for our physical universe!, but lets say there is scientific apartheid that will never accept such selfawareness i.e. the king to get naked, at best will rush quickly to dress up in whatever has at hand, also in same time probably raping with sleeping pills all that see “their” faulty physics, and finally leaving the stage offended at worst so from protest to force apology to “their” exceptional stamina, coz yeah they hold the keys from the so long fortified labs that either will stay theirs by their terms or hm will be destroyed, if not by them by “their” maecenas who secured such pp lobotomy to become neopagan mainstream dogma, yet even “they” finally will evaporate if do that, coz definitely suicide should not be cowardly or selfish act, so if fall “they” want to fall all!?, hope the hijacked academia is not blind enmasse till such extremes, surely will find a way to bring by themselves clever resistance!, drop by drop, we can sense the change is just right the corner …
but lets get back to the behavior of aether as wave as gas and as plasma, is it possible the same substance to shapeshift in various states by piezoelectric potential excited by the vibration of photons under various circumstances of temperature or angles of motion, solenoid pulses that predicts the behavior [7] hm, could be that torsion idea is fractal derived from time and plasma idea that follows such vortex vectors spreading and mingling in further similar patterns etc. etc. possibilities of reinventing the wheels … btw dont take this speculative wire walk as mine conviction, I am just talking aloud!, far from JPFs brainstorming and pretty close to zzzzzzzz geometry of my couch …
If light and electricity be understood as particular forms of motion, then we must inevitably recognise the existence of a peculiar luminiferous (universal) ether as a material, transmitting this form of motion. …
…
… In the case of limited solution of liquids in liquids, the difference between the solvent and the substance dissolved is clearly seen. The former (that is, the solvent) may be added in an unlimited quantity, and yet the solution obtained will always be uniform, whilst only a definite saturating proportion of the substance dissolved can be taken, We will take water and common (sulphuric) ether. On shaking the ether with the water, it will be remarked that a portion of it dissolves in the water. If the ether be taken in such a quantity that it saturates the water and a portion of it remains undissolved, then this remaining portion will act as a solvent, and water will diffuse through it and also form a saturated solution of water in the ether taken. Thus two saturated solutions will be obtained. One solution will contain ether dissolved in water, and the other solution will contain water dissolved in ether. These two solutions will arrange themselves in two layers, according to their density; the ethereal solution of water will be on the top. If the upper ethereal solution be poured off from the aqueous solution, any quantity of ether may be added to it; this shows that the dissolving substance is ether. If water be added to it, it is no longer dissolved in it; this shows that water saturates the ether—here water is the substance dissolved. If we act in the same manner with the lower layer, we shall find that water is the solvent and ether the substance dissolved. By taking different amounts of ether and water, the degree of solubility of ether in water, and of water in ether, may be easily determined. Water approximately dissolves 1⁄10 of its volume of ether, and ether dissolves a very small quantity of water. Let us now imagine that the liquid poured in dissolves a considerable amount of water, and that water dissolves a considerable amount of the liquid. Two layers could not be formed, because the saturated solutions would resemble each other, and therefore they would intermix in all proportions. This is, consequently, a case of a phenomenon where two liquids present considerable co-efficients of solubility in each other, but where it is impossible to say what these co-efficients are, because it is impossible to obtain a saturated solution. …
…
… The positive discrepancies from the law at low pressures are of particular interest, and, according to the above-mentioned determinations made by myself, Kirpicheff, and Hemilian, and verified (by two methods) by K. D. Kraevitch and Prof. Ramsay (London, 1894), they are proper to all gases (even to those which are easily compressed into a liquid state, such as carbonic and sulphurous anhydrides). These discrepancies approach the case of a very high rarefaction of gases, where a gas is near to a condition of maximum dispersion of its molecules, and perhaps presents a passage towards the substance termed ‘luminiferous ether’ which fills up interplanetary and interstellar space. If we suppose that gases are rarefiable to a definite limit only, having attained which they (like solids) do not alter in volume with a decrease of pressure, then on the one hand the passage of the atmosphere at its upper limits into a homogeneous ethereal medium becomes comprehensible, and on the other hand it would be expected that gases would, in a state of high rarefaction (i.e. when small masses of gases occupy large volumes, or when furthest removed from a liquid state), present positive discrepancies from Boyle and Mariotte’s law. Our present acquaintance with this province of highly rarefied gases is very limited (because direct measurements are exceedingly difficult to make, and are hampered by possible errors of experiment, which may be considerable), and its further development promises to elucidate much in respect to natural phenomena. To the three states of matter (solid, liquid, and gaseous) it is evident a fourth must yet be added, the ethereal or ultra-gaseous (as Crookes proposed), understanding by this, matter in its highest possible state of rarefaction. …
…
… Generalising from the above, the weight of the molecule determines the properties of a substance independently of its composition —i.e. of the number and quality of the atoms entering into the molecule—whenever the substance is in a gaseous state (for instance, the density of gases and vapours, the velocity of sound in them, their specific heat, &c.), or passes into that state, as we see in the latent heat of evaporation. This is intelligible from the point of view of the atomic theory in its present form, for, besides a rapid motion proper to the molecules of gaseous bodies, it is further necessary to postulate that these molecules are dispersed in space (filled throughout with the luminiferous ether) like the heavenly bodies distributed throughout the universe. Here, as there, it is only the degree of removal (the distance) and the masses of substances which take effect, while those peculiarities of a substance which are expressed in chemical transformations, and only come into action on near approach or on contact, are in abeyance by reason of the dispersal. Hence it is at once obvious,[330] in the first place, that in the case of solids and liquids, in which the molecules are closer together than in gases and vapours, a greater complexity is to be expected, i.e. a dependence of all the properties not only upon the weight of the molecule but also upon its composition and quality, or upon the properties of the individual chemical atoms forming the molecule; and, in the second place, that, in the case of a small number of molecules of any substance being disseminated through a mass of another substance—for example, in the formation of weak (dilute) solutions (although in this case there is an act of chemical reaction—i.e. a combination, decomposition, or substitution)—the dispersed molecules will alter the properties of the medium in which they are dissolved, almost in proportion to the molecular weight and almost independently of their composition. The greater the number of molecules disseminated—i.e. the stronger the solution—the more clearly defined will those properties become which depend upon the composition of the dissolved substance and its relation to the molecules of the solvent, for the distribution of one kind of molecules in the sphere of attraction of others cannot but be influenced by their mutual chemical reaction. These general considerations give a starting point for explaining why, since the appearance of Van’t Hoff’s memoir (1886), ‘The Laws of Chemical Equilibrium in a Diffused Gaseous or Liquid State’ (see Chapter I., Note 19), it has been found more and more that dilute (weak) solutions exhibit such variations of properties as depend wholly upon the weight and number of the molecules and not upon their composition, and even give the means of determining the weight of molecules by studying the variations of the properties of a solvent on the introduction of a small quantity of a substance passing into solution. Although this subject has been already partially considered in the first chapter (in speaking of solutions), and properly belongs to a special (physical) branch of chemistry, we touch upon it here because the meaning and importance of molecular weights are seen in it in a new and peculiar light, and because it gives a method for determining them whenever it is possible to obtain dilute solutions. Among the numerous properties of dilute solutions which have been investigated (for instance, the osmotic pressure, vapour tension, boiling point, internal friction, capillarity, variation with change of temperature, specific heat, electroconductivity, index of refraction, &c.) we will select one—the ‘depression’ or fall of the temperature of freezing (Raoult’s cryoscopic method), not only because this method has been the most studied, but also because it is the most easily carried out and most frequently applied for determining the weight of the molecules of substances in solution, although here, owing to the novelty of the subject there are[331] also many experimental discrepancies which cannot as yet be explained by theory. …
…
… At the beginning of the year 1860, the doctrine of the limit of reaction and of the influence of mass on the process of chemical transformations received a very important support in the researches of Berthelot and P. de Saint-Gilles on the formation of the ethereal salts RX from the alcohols ROH and acids HX, when water is also formed. This conversion is essentially very similar to the formation of salts, but[439] differs in that it proceeds slowly at the ordinary temperature, extending over whole years, and is not complete—that is, it has a distinct limit determined by a reverse reaction; thus an ethereal salt RX with water gives an alcohol ROH and an acid HX—up to that limit generally corresponding with two-thirds of the alcohol taken, if the action proceed between molecular quantities of alcohol and acid. …
…
… Spectroscopic observations are still further complicated by the fact that one and the same substance gives different spectra at different temperatures. This is especially the case with gases whose spectra are obtained by an electric discharge in tubes. Plücker, Wüllner, Schuster, and others showed that at low temperatures and pressures the spectra of iodine, sulphur, nitrogen, oxygen, &c. are quite different from the spectra of the same elements at high temperatures and pressures. This may either depend on the fact that the elements change their molecular structure with a change of temperature, just as ozone is converted into oxygen (for instance, from N2 molecules are obtained containing only one atom of nitrogen), or else it may be because at low temperature certain rays have a greater relative intensity than those which appear at higher temperatures. If we suppose that the molecules of a gas are in continual motion, with a velocity dependent on the temperature, then it must be admitted that they often strike against each other and rebound, and thus communicate peculiar motions to each other and the supposed ether, which express themselves in luminiferous phenomena. A rise of the temperature or an increase in the density of a gas must have an influence on the collision of its molecules and luminiferous motions thus produced, and this may be the cause of the difference of the spectra under these circumstances. It has been shown by direct experiment that gases compressed by pressure, when the collision of the molecules must be frequent and varied, exhibit a more complex spectrum on the passage of an electric spark than rarefied gases, and that even a continuous spectrum appears. In order to show the variability of the spectrum according to the circumstances under which it proceeds, it may be mentioned that potassium sulphate fused on a platinum wire gives, on the passage of a series of sparks, a distinct system of lines, 583–578, whilst when a series of sparks is passed through a solution of this salt this system of lines is faint, and when Roscoe and Schuster observed the absorption spectrum of the vapour of metallic potassium (which is green) they remarked a number of lines of the same intensity as the above system in the red, orange, and yellow portions.
https://www.dmitrimendeleev.com/p/the-principles-of-chemistry-volume-i.html#FNanchor_13_22
~
so medndeleevs logic postulated rudimental understanding for plasma as part of every other state of matter, tho it should be taken in account other variables so would be derived proper idea eg. “Till 1920-ths being on the right path of classical physics, the theory of an internal constitution of the Sun and stars has used achievements of the gas dynamics and the thermodynamics of Carnot – Clausius – Mendeleev – Clayperon – Van-der-Waals.” [8] whether directly or indirectly influencing its structure, I’ll say directly through electron rhythmics and indirectly as giving fractal vectors of flow direction path rhythm (however who would prefer) , the question is how the current mainstream academics would switch lets say from rhcp [9] to bmw [10][10][10] hm surely some crossover will help [11] tho its most useful to switch on pure spiritual vibe [12] yet we need all to push and help so give a Prayer from time to time for blissful future of Mankind even “they” want everything to fell apart, if not else someone will survive, and Survival is our destiny even we dont like to [13]
~
lets say mendeleev logic has chess alike move i.e. element X and element Y to be the first two elements, that currently are known as proton~electron~neutron (positive~negative~neutral), or cation~anion~ion, where this third Z element would be hm hm hm breath (maybe) photon … someone give a hand … I never meditate or astral seek for idea, just throwing assumption …
Mendeleev denied that the periodic system could be explained along the lines indicated by Thomson or, for that matter, in any other way that assumed the chemical atoms to have an internal structure. This was an idea that the great Russian chemist vigorously resisted. At that time, Thomson no longer identified the primordial particle with an ether vortex, but his thinking about atomic constitution continued to be guided by the vortex atom theory even after the announcement of the true primordial atom, the electron. [14]
that means The Spirit have descended extra!, i.e. go regularly on Liturgies and You will get Holy!!!, as much one is leaving aside the earthly so its gaining on the heavenly!, then You’ll not need to guess what is for measuring how in Physics, but You’ll know it sense it feel it, stil even someone drops in Grace due to graceless lifestyle the memory from the past feats is insurance … for many that would be first general confession, for others the merciful hearth, or unjudging stamina and forgiveness even for those that molested You, etc. etc. but noone is perfect so is not “our” exceptional mainstream physics, so be patient, find maybe good healing place like GDS and wait to see how things are advancing …
btw dont take my thinking analyzing and/or reasoning for granted Please recheck everything with smile on Your face doable if background vibe is Regenerative one [
